1
61
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) by silence7 to c/climate

If you’re a US citizen, no matter where in the world, start by making sure you’re registered to vote. Many districts are gerrymandered, so you’ll want to register as the party that’s likely to win congressional and/or state legislative districts where you live, and vote in that party’s primary.

In addition to voting, you’ll want to influence politics beyond that. Your local races are a good place to start; cities and states control local land use and things like building codes.

To affect congress, you’ll want to pick swing house districts or swing senate seats. Volunteer and donate accordingly.

For President, the reality is that Biden has done far more than Trump would even consider, starting with the Inflation Reduction Act, and continuing through numerous executive actions. Getting involved in this race means volunteering, and if you can, donating to the Biden Victory Fund. If you’re giving really large amounts of money, and the logistics of it work, go to an in-person event and talk to the candidate or other official about climate:

2
17
submitted 3 hours ago by silence7 to c/climate
3
83
submitted 9 hours ago by silence7 to c/climate
4
28
submitted 17 hours ago by silence7 to c/climate

Transcript (and errors in it) are mine, as NPR is mainly a broadcast outlet.

Tamara 0:00
The salad chain restaurants Sweetgreen surprised a lot of people when they recently said they would begin serving beef and Los Angeles area vegans got an even bigger shock. The restaurant chain, formerly known as Sage Vegan says they will soon offer meat and dairy these restaurants highlight their sustainable goals. But beef and dairy are huge sources of planet warming pollution. Both restaurants say the beef would come from farms that practice what's known as regenerative farming. But what does this actually mean for the climate? To learn more, we are joined by Julia Simon from NPRs climate desk. Hey, thanks for having me. started at the beginning. What is regenerative farming? What how does it work?

Julia 0:42
So a step back soil has the potential to draw down carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it but many conventional farming practices end up releasing carbon. regenerative agriculture is this umbrella term for a bunch of farming practices different from conventional farming that can in theory be better for the soil and the environment?

Tamara 1:05
So give us an example of how regenerative farming is different from conventional farming.

Julia 1:11
Yeah, so one example is cover crops, which basically means that there's always some kind of plant like grasses or legumes on your fields versus conventional farming, letting fields lie fallow. Emily Oldfield, as soil scientists at the Environmental Defense Fund says that can help lead to more healthy soil,

Emily Oldfield 1:32
you're preventing against soil loss and erosion, you're you're maximizing the presence of living roots. So you're sort of feeding all those microbes that are down in there.

Tamara 1:41
Okay, I get it for plants. But explain these restaurants say that their beef is coming from regenerative farms. How does it work with livestock?

Julia 1:49
There's something called regenerative grazing, where you're managing the way livestock like cattle graze on grasses to improve soil health, among other things. regenerative

Tamara 1:59
agriculture often gets discussed in the context of climate solutions, does it reduce emissions?

Julia 2:07
Yeah, there are ways it could, but some scientists worry about some climate benefits getting overstated. Give us example, their scientists say that keeping soils more intact can increase the amount of carbon stored in them, which is good, right carbon dioxide, it's a planet heating gas, great to have carbon in the soil versus the atmosphere. But there are lots of questions about how much carbon gets stored in the soil by changing these practices. And critically, how long the carbon stays in the soil. Here's Eric Slessor, of professor at Yale University,

Eric Slessor 2:40
organic matter and soil is a lot of material. There are microorganisms living on it, and they're constantly breaking it down and releasing it as co2 goes back to the atmosphere. And so soil is not a sealed off compartment. It's dynamic. Also,

Julia 2:56
Also things like drought, heat can affect the amount of carbon that soil stores. And while a farmer might be doing regenerative farming now, there's no guarantee that they'll be doing these practices into the future. Slessor of says this is a big question mark over climate claims around regenerative agriculture.

Eric Slessor 3:16
In my mind, that is the biggest uncertainty is how long is that carbon going to stay out of the atmosphere if it ends up in the soil in the form of organic matter?

Tamara 3:26
Is a regenerative farming does not sound like an exact science at this point. And the long term climate benefits may be in question. But in terms of beef, the climate impacts are pretty clear. Right?

Julia 3:40
Right. The main reason cattle hit the planet so much is that cattle burp and those burps have a lot of methane, this very potent greenhouse gas. Also in much of the world making room for cattle and food for cattle drives deforestation, which also heats the planet.

Tamara 3:58
I want to ask about these companies Sweetgreen and Sage Vegan which on its website now says it is rebranding as Sage Regenerative. What do they have to say about all of this?

Julia 4:07
Both Sweetgreen and Sage Regenerative did not respond to NPRs Requests for Comments. But again, we should say regenerative agriculture does have lots of environmental benefits. These practices are really good for soils that can reduce erosion water runoff, the questions come with the claimed climate benefits. Ultimately, experts I spoke to say when it comes to climate emissions from food, there might be an impulse to tweak around the edges, but meaningful emissions reductions will have to focus on the big sources of emissions like cattle. Research shows. just swapping out beef in a meal can have a big impact on a person's daily climate emissions.

Tamara 4:50
And our doctors might suggest the same. That's NPR's Julia Simon. Thanks, Julia.

Julia 4:54
Thank you, Tamra.

5
84
submitted 19 hours ago by silence7 to c/climate
6
7
submitted 1 day ago by silence7 to c/climate

Una confluencia de factores como el cambio climático, la expansión urbanística y una infraestructura deficiente ha llevado a Ciudad de México al borde de una severa crisis de agua.

In English

7
61
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by silence7 to c/climate

A collision of climate change, urban sprawl and poor infrastructure has pushed Mexico City to the brink of a profound water crisis.

En Español

8
26
submitted 1 day ago by silence7 to c/climate
9
42
submitted 1 day ago by silence7 to c/climate
10
94
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by silence7 to c/climate

But “as it gets warmer earlier, we see a larger amount of mosquitoes earlier,” said Max Vigilant, director of mosquito and vector control in Harris County, where Houston is located. “We are getting hotter temperatures earlier.”

“This is the impact that climate change has had on Harris Country,” Vigilant added.

11
92
submitted 2 days ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/climate
12
28
submitted 2 days ago by silence7 to c/climate
13
22
submitted 2 days ago by andrewrgross to c/climate

I work for a large biotech manufacturer doing field work. I -- and thousands of other field engineers -- are assigned company cars, which are all ICEs.

I have pointed out in the past that this is a mistake: we should at the very least, allow the engineers the choice to select an electric car from the options provided.

The fleet management team tested this out, but ultimately passed up on the option, because they wanted to shift towards reimbursing drivers instead of managing the fleet. They argued that this met everyone's needs, including allowing employees to drive electric if they want to buy one.

I think this is a big mistake: most people still find the transition complicated when shopping personally, but fleet program can manage a large number of vehicles purchasing, insurance, and maintenance much better, and is better equipped to help people get home chargers if they want. They literally piloted this exact program, and then chose not to expand it.

I want to contact relevant parties and try to assertively communicate that in this moment, we should all be in a war footing. This is an absolute crisis, and the company is clearly looking at simple options to do its part and leaving them unused because it's not aligned with their preferred proposal.

Can anyone help me collect up the shortest, most direct sources to share a five minute slide deck that says, "WAKE THE F*** UP! ROLL OUT THE PLAN YOU ALREADY SET UP AND TESTED, THIS IS AN EMERGENCY, PEOPLE!"

14
40
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by silence7 to c/climate
15
106
submitted 2 days ago by silence7 to c/climate
16
44
submitted 2 days ago by silence7 to c/climate
17
164
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by silence7 to c/climate

context:

What Trump promised oil CEOs as he asked them to steer $1 billion to his campaign

Donald Trump has pledged to scrap President Biden’s policies on electric vehicles and wind energy, as well as other initiatives opposed by the fossil fuel industry.

18
235
submitted 2 days ago by silence7 to c/climate
19
35
submitted 2 days ago by silence7 to c/climate

To be clear: we're going to use renewable hydrogen for some things, such as fertilizer manufacturing — there isn't any other way to do them sustainably. There are applications for which it's one of the most expensive choices, such as home heating, and a whole host of industrial processes and aviation sitting in between.

20
118
submitted 2 days ago by silence7 to c/climate

Archived copies of the article: archive.today web.archive.org ghostarchive.org

21
7
submitted 2 days ago by silence7 to c/climate
22
44
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by solo@kbin.earth to c/climate

A realistic understanding of their costs and risks is critical.

What are SMRs?

  1. SMRs are not more economical than large reactors.

  2. SMRs are not generally safer or more secure than large light-water reactors.

  3. SMRs will not reduce the problem of what to do with radioactive waste.

  4. SMRs cannot be counted on to provide reliable and resilient off-the-grid power for facilities, such as data centers, bitcoin mining, hydrogen or petrochemical production.

  5. SMRs do not use fuel more efficiently than large reactors.

[Edit: If people have links that contradict any the above, could you please share in the comment section?]

23
43
submitted 2 days ago by solo@kbin.earth to c/climate

Companies are becoming ever craftier in their efforts to pose as more climate-friendly than they are

The name of the ruse: a taxonomy of greenwashing

Mechanism

  • Misleading information
  • Attention deflection
  • Attention reduction (absolute)
  • Attention reduction (peer-overshadowed)
  • Attention timing

Classic application

  • Misleading claims made by firms themselves
  • Greenshifting of blame on to demanding consumers
  • Limited disclosure of worthy ambitions
  • Decent disclosure but substandard vis à vis peers
  • Delayed disclosure

Sophisticated application

  • Greenlabelling by third parties, which certify firms’ performance
  • Greenlighting of good-news case studies
  • Fuller disclosure, but with greenhushing of details
  • Greencrowding: substandard disclosure en masse
  • Greenrinsing: headline-grabbing targets get gradually diluted

Archive link

24
57
submitted 3 days ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/climate
25
7
submitted 3 days ago by jorge@feddit.cl to c/climate
view more: next ›

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

4431 readers
384 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS