The paper makes it clear that it can — and it's actually important to avoid doing things like random murder. But the kind of nonviolent acts we've seen so far aren't a problem.
They also had a null result on policy support; the main impact was activating people towards more moderate activist groups.
I don't expect commercial extraction to be limited to one area.
In practice, I see people in your situation spend their additional budget on insulation and an air-source heat pump, rather than go to geothermal.
Starting a nuclear war is still likely far worse than even status quo.
If you've got 100 amp service, as is typical for US homes, it's in theory possible to do things like set up your EV charger to pause when the dryer or oven is running, and end up without the need for a new breaker box.
Sure, but the most of the ideas people would be happy about involve keeping the bulk of the human population alive, along with the rest of the ecosystem.
To be fair to her, I don't think her views have actually constituted the limiting factor on US action — that would have been what could pass through the Senate, where we needed the vote of a literal coal baron to get even budget reconciliation passed (that takes only 50 votes + the VP, anything else requires 60 votes)
Yeah, and he claimed to have covered it up so that it wouldn't be in his military records. So now they've got witnesses to both time periods, one saying he wasn't shot while in the military, and the other saying that they heard him admit to shooting himself.
The problem is that the things he can do without congressional support can be easily overturned by the next President — and the Republicans have a majority in the House of Representatives.