SPR_860

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
 

Journalists wildly exaggerate how much neurology knows about brains.

but assuming that a good prefrontal cortex is helpful for good decision making,

a soldier occupying a country w/ a hostile population where he doesn't speak the language, has a desperate need for one.

If the "prefrontal cortex" myth is true, how on earth did we send 18 year olds to war in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Vietnam?

There is no job in the world that requires more rational thinking than making life or death decisions effecting civilians, all your buddies, and yourself.

but no world government has ever said that in combat they'll only have men over 25 years of age.

Never.

Not once in thousands of years of this obvious problem, has anyone noticed the problem, written about it, or tried to fix it.

(hint: it's bullshit)

but when it comes to sex,

women under 25 who decide to date a rich, famous, good-looking movie star

are immediately diagnosed with the young stupid prefrontal cortex syndrome.

Having romantic relationships

is so much harder than living in a war zone

and being sent into combat every day and trying not to kill civilians, or get killed, or let your comrades get killed...

Gotta have full brain development before you kiss a hot guy. I mean OMG.

#SPR860

3
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by SPR_860@lemmy.tf to c/commonsense@lemmy.tf
 

There's a scene in the Game of Thrones where a man called The Hound finds out where an old farmer has hidden his silver. The Hound promptly robs him. There was, of course, no way to call the police. The state was not there to defend the old man's property. This was a fairly typical problem in ancient and medieval times.

In modern times if Mr Jones kept a bag of gold on his kitchen table, few would try to steal it because most peeps would be deterred by the threat of incarceration. Jones can call the cops. The state sometimes fails, but it sincerely tries to protect Jones' property rights. But even this low level of risk is too much for most people. Mr Smith prefers to keep his money in the bank. The state insures his deposits there. Official channels allow him to access his monetary assets, and he has legal recourse if there is any dispute.

The BitCoin ideology however says that the state should have no role in the financial system. So BitCoiners take their money out of legally existing institutions. They might put their virtual cash on an exchange, the crypto equivalent of a bank, but those have been collapsing as their founders simply stole the money.

So crypto enthusiasts are left trying to figure out how to keep their valuables (which are really just long chains of letters and numbers stored on a computer) safe in their own homes. It's a return to ancient times where everyone has to fend for themselves. Today it's not likely to be a nasty barbarian with a battle ax, but the chances hackers will try to get your crypto wealth thru digital trickery are very high.

If you want to spend the rest of your life trying to stay one step ahead of the hackers who would love to steal the virtual bag of cyber-gold you keep in your living room, go ahead and convert your assets to BitCoin. The vast majority of the population will not join you on your journey back to the medieval stateless Wild West of crypto-finance.

 

Clicked on a title containing an interesting topic. The title ends with "Here's Why" (which is of course a lie. YouTubers don't know. They don't tell you why, and if they did, they'd be wrong.)

I see an attractive extrovert who loves the sound of her own voice. She's not very bright. She reads a few lies from some magazine articles.

She repeats some long ago debunked garbage about testosterone.

She repeats some of the trite old observations like "I find it so interesting that when the woman is older, she's a cougar and that's like cool, but if the man is older then he's seen as creepy" Wow. Fucking Einstein here.

The comments surprised me tho'

Under a vid about young people not having sex, everyone, tons of people were writing their age, sexual history, and why they are or are not having sex.

To me this is totally bizarre. Why the fuck would anyone care? and WTF would motivate you to post that on the internet?

I guess some part of my brain is missing. The part that makes you want to type out your sex life for the world to see in the YouTube comment section.

 

The revival of Puritanism is making everyone yap about the horrid thought crimes that were committed against them.

"I was 12 when a guy thought I was cute and made eyes at me."

Utterly boring, typical behavior is reframed as sexual abuse. Usually facilitated by some extremely vague but negative sounding word like "sexualized"

#SPR860

 

and you can hear it in the way younger generations comment on 30 year old TV shows.

Watch this vid: https://youtu.be/QtLPewEg-yc .#SPR860

 

“They dated since he was 17. He turned 18 and now faces 15 years behind bars.”

And when he gets out he will be on the Sex Offender Registry, too.

https://miamiherald.com/news/local/community/florida-keys/article225560840.html .

 

Insane weirdos e.g. Musk, think that we need to make more babies, cuz somehow having less than 10 billion people in the near future is not enough,

but simultaneously this planet sucks, so we gotta move to Mars, a much smaller planet, which has no air or water.

#Batshit

 

Statistically poverty, substance abuse, and dysfunctional families often correlate. Domestic abuse is in the mix too. No one can isolate one single cause, because the world doesn’t work in the oversimplified way we’d like it to.

Imagine you’re a girl in a poor abusive household. There’s really not much you can do but pray for a better future. Then you hit puberty, and you become sexually attractive to the men in town. This may be the first power you have ever had.

Some peeps are endowed with the power to physically or psychologically dominate their peers with implied threats of violence. Others are gifted with natural leadership abilities. But not all. Then there’s a group that is simply pretty and sexy.

If you are this poor young woman from an abusive family, and by chance, nature gives you a sexy body that men like, why wouldn’t you start flirting with a man who treats you nicely and makes you feel loved? And wouldn’t it be even better if the man had a job and a car?

Your way to get away from your hellish home on a Saturday night may literally be the vehicle owned by your new boyfriend, but your ticket to a better life could definitely seem like a serious relationship with a somewhat older man.

Young adults (aka teens) from poor families tend to have more unplanned pregnancies than their peers from rich families. There are many possible reasons for that. Better access to contraception being the most obvious one.

Young adults (aka teens) from rich families also have much better access to options for terminating an unplanned pregnancy than their poor counterparts. So statistically teenage mothers tend to be much less wealthy than older first time mothers.

There was a famous study done by Darroch in the 90s. (see below) It shows a lot of what I have outlined here. When California Gov Gray Davis saw the study, however, he ignored all the relevant data, and decided that the CAUSE of all these problems was statutory rape.

His plan was to get the cops & prosecutors to put more of the boyfriends with jobs & cars in prison as a way to solve the teen pregnancy problem. This was, of course, illogical to the point of batshit crazy. Smart people at the time pointed that out.

https://guttmacher.org/journals/psrh/1996/01/can-statutory-rape-laws-be-effective-preventing-adolescent-pregnancy

So people in the 90s screwed up. Big deal. Who cares?

The main issue here, is that Gov Davis’s batshit stupid thinking went mainstream, and dominates our discourse to this day. Big TV personalities like Oprah picked it up and spread it generously.

The goofy myth based on contorted logic took on a life of its own. The general public, who never spend a lot of time digging into the research or thinking things thru, started to believe that the causation runs opposite to the reality.

That is to say, people now believe that teenage women dating men 10 years older than them causes them to be poor and show the symptoms of an abuse victim.

The obvious reality is that poverty and dysfunction is what led them to choose that partner in the first place.

Criminalizing a young woman’s choice of boyfriend isn’t the way to make her life happy and healthy. Incarcerating the father of a young woman’s baby is one of the worst things you can do to her and her infant. We need to bring a little common sense back to this discussion.

 

Our brains and bodies never stop changing. There is no point of “finish developing”. and even if there was that wouldn't prove people before that point are stupid. The whole idea is garbage that bigots use to justify hating on specific demographic.

and “lacking any real life experience”? well, sure, because we barred them from entering adult society. They have been legally and socially prevented from gaining any of that experience. That’s not a problem with them, that’s a direct result of us treating them like shit, and creating a problem that need not exist.

 

A radical change in the way we see ourselves, our bodies, and sexuality, and normal human interactions, coincides with the meteoric rise of the word "sexualize"

https://kraut.zone/w/vNBPA96oiUohpm2HpT7HuF .

 

Bullying is natural, which is all the more reason we have to fight it.

When you think someone is creepy.... ask yourself...

kraut.zone/w/vetZGvKLfGC1c1UKZ (24 min)

 

People with zero experience in the field will start in an entry level position. That has nothing to do with age. It is true if you are 36, 16, or 56.

The simple fact is that 16 year olds are not children. They have nothing in common with 6 year olds, but almost everything in common with 26 year olds.

[–] SPR_860@lemmy.tf 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

again with the vile accusations

you're proving my point

[–] SPR_860@lemmy.tf 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

bla bla bla

Lemmy is dominated by people like you who have no interest in serious discussion.

Just a big cheerleading session with lots of people who already agree with you.

[–] SPR_860@lemmy.tf 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your virtue signalling will do exactly what it is designed to.

You will look like a truly moral person, and I will get banned for asking uncomfortable questions, and telling truths that nobody can stand seeing.

but nobody will learn anything. nobody's life will be better because of your dumb virtue signalling.

[–] SPR_860@lemmy.tf 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Yet you are unwilling to spend 2 minutes learning what pedophilia is.

[–] SPR_860@lemmy.tf 2 points 1 year ago

People HATE when you challenge their ideas.

Teens are not children.

Pedophilia has nothing to do with teens.

but simple facts like that will get you banned from social media.

Hmmmmmmm.

[–] SPR_860@lemmy.tf 1 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Unpopular opinion and a flurry of vile abuse follows.

It's like I said. There is no serious discussion on Lemmy.

[–] SPR_860@lemmy.tf 1 points 1 year ago

I posted an unpopular opinion and I was told to go fuck myself.

There is no serious discussion on Lemmy.

[–] SPR_860@lemmy.tf -1 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Any mention of teenagers being normal human beings with normal lives and rights is taboo.

Pedophilia has nothing to do with teenagers. Even giving the correct scientific definition of pedophilia will get you banned. Lemmy allows no serious discussion.

[–] SPR_860@lemmy.tf 0 points 1 year ago (15 children)

This 3-minute video explains it pretty well

https://kraut.zone/w/2UCgNSZ3tvKm6KTDCNHGDv .

[–] SPR_860@lemmy.tf -3 points 1 year ago (17 children)

You may think this is a joke or a pathetic cop out, but I was literally banned yesterday for posting 3 unpopular opinions in a Lemmy thread (which specifically asked for opinions which will get downvoted).

If I post them again, I'll be banned again within 24 hours.

(I have NEVER posted anything illegal or immoral)

[–] SPR_860@lemmy.tf -5 points 1 year ago (19 children)

pineapple on pizza is immoral and should be illegal

is expressing an unpopular opinion illegal or immoral?

unpopular opinions are not tolerated on Lemmy. no serious discussions will ever happen here.

[–] SPR_860@lemmy.tf -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So your view is that society is always right and no taboos should ever be challenged or discussed or debated. Okay.

view more: next ›