Biden could do more to attack Trump, too. Right-wing domestic terrorists are bolder now than ever and he's letting it happen.
this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
637 points (95.4% liked)
politics
19120 readers
3423 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Why not both?
I'd love to see it, but Dems are going to run neither and try to skirt another "at least he's not trump" win. Not excited to see how it plans out, 2020 was entirely too close for comfort.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Inflation reduction act. No recession so far. Student debt forgiveness. He’s not just sitting on his hands.
Exactly. Anybody paying attention would realize he's delivering on so much shit no Republican in my working memory ever has.
Exactly. Too much Trump outrage posting - fueled by the media for advertising clicks. Ignore the cheese turd.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Noone is paying attention to that. Their strategy should be hammering this over and over and over nonstop. They have had no strategy for a year while focus was on the Republicans, and they still have no agenda other than Trump bad and Biden is not that old.
load more comments
(2 replies)
What matters is perception and public messaging and that is currently one of a centrist president incapable of reigning in a foreign ally or continually calling out House Republicans for their shenanigans that put American lives at risk at home and abroad.
Conservatives have constant control of the conversation because they have zero qualms publicly stating how their political adversaries stand in their way. But instead it looks like Democrats trying to win Republicans support by adopting republican policies instead of bullying them into accepting the plan of the majority party of the upper legislature and presidency.
load more comments
(17 replies)
I'd love to see her run for President.
I'd vote for her.
I'd also would need to purchase industrial bulk popcorn to watch all the conservatives literally implode if she was nominated.
When she streamed with hbomberguy and said 'trans rights' on the mic I genuinely hoped she would. She is young, she is based, she has charisma most democrats lack. But dems seem to prefer safe bets so they'd nominate Joe until he dies. Even at that time they can vote her in just because she's not a geriatic pos like her opponent.
She may be able to next time. But it all depends on this election. Switching from an already sitting President to her would never happen. That's like firing the person who made your business run somewhat normal after a complete shit show.
load more comments
(1 replies)
'24 is the first election she's old enough. Give her time.
load more comments
(10 replies)
If we could stop funding a genocide on Gaza, that'd be a step in the right direction as well.
It's crazy how people are acting like we're the problem for not wanting to vote for either genocidal candidate. Just find someone better and I'll vote for them, DNC. Unless you can't.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(14 replies)
corporate sponsors like "the other guy is bad" more than "here's the plan to get the working class a bigger slice of the pie"
load more comments
(3 replies)
She's right. People are tired of the status quo which is slowly being dismantled by Republicans in the House, etc. Attacking them only further entrenches people who lean right. Hilary already made this mistake when she thought Trump was an easy win and ignored flyover states. This is how you lose swing state votes, too. Biden and his team have done a lot of good things, but it's all for naught if nobody sees it - his messaging sucks.
I could give a shit about his messaging. His actions suck. Don't block strikes. Don't support genocide.
What she said was "I think we can certainly do more to be advancing our vision, and I believe we have a strong vision that we can run on." She specifically calls out:
- Codifying abortion/reproductive rights [House and Senate races matter!]
- Lowering Medicare age
- Student loan forgiveness
Contrary to OP's title, she actually pushes back on the false narrative that Biden is running as "not Trump".
She does say that it will be important to demonstrate "what we are willing to do with" governing power between now and November.
Biden has to have more to offer than to be the alternative to Trump, and because even bringing up his age causes condemnation, I'm not sure there's actually much else being considered about Biden as a candidate.
Biden would rather lose to fascists than compromise with leftists and progressives.
I'm pretty excited for the Amtrak expansion myself. It paves the way for actual urban transit options.
load more comments
(9 replies)
American politics is only about slinging as much mud at your opponent as possible and painting the grimmest doomsday picture as possible about everything.
Actually having a vision and a dream doesn't work, unfortunately.
load more comments
(4 replies)
“Get your MAGA hat” –Fetterman
view more: next ›