this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
395 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

59582 readers
3910 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"There's no way to get there without a breakthrough," OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said, arguing that AI will soon need even more energy.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jplee@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Is the answer people? I think I’ve seen this movie before.

[–] bc1@lemmy.l0l.city 10 points 10 months ago

Subsidize retrofitting the entire nation with solar and invert it back into the grid

[–] Holyginz@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Might be because it's a LLM not an AI and requires massive amounts of data to be funneled into it to actually work. My admittedly limited understanding of it makes it seem like it's just another buzzword for things like neural networks and machine learning.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

LLMs are a specific application of neutral networks which utilize machine learning.

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If those 'buzzwords' aren't ai then what do you think ai is? It's like saying circle and square aren't shapes they're buzzwords

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

The positive thing there is that it probably paces our development. If we can't get to true AGI without way more energy than we can currently produce, then we don't have true AGI risk right now.

There's still risk because it might not be true or we might be able to get close enough to do damage. But slowing down AI is fine by me.

[–] Defaced@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Wow, I fucking hate this guy the more he opens his mouth. He can seriously fuck off right now, if he thinks AI realistically needs him at this point he's sadly mistaken.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 months ago (26 children)

hey guys, theres this thing called nuclear energy. It's pretty cool.

[–] Welt@lazysoci.al 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thorium molten salt reactor

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] Lennnny@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

He's going after the beryllium agitator, someone stop him.

[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So will AI (or more accurately LLM) be the push needed to make limitless fusion energy a reality?

[–] mriormro@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Obviously not. We’re being faced with an existential threat if we don’t secure alternative, sustainable forms of energy and even that threat isn’t enough to motivate our species.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheRealCharlesEames@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago
[–] Overzeetop@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Get rid of bitcoin and you solve the energy problem.

[–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shortdorkyasian@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago
[–] SuperIce@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (4 children)

This is probably why he's invested so much into Helion Energy, who are trying to make a small and cheap nuclear fusion reactor.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›