this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
446 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3014 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 14 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

100% guarantee price raises across the board, even for stuff not affected by tarrifs/mass deportation labor shortages.

It'll be covid all over again, an excuse to price gouge the fuck out of those who can least afford it.

[–] ThePerfectLink@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

Realistically though, that's how tariffs just work. With products costing more, theoretically that should drive demand down and eventually lead to fewer imports. Of course, if there's still no competing product or the product is a basic necessity, then it'll likely just result in people paying more.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 56 points 3 hours ago (6 children)

But the question is, will American manufacturing make up for the costs? Or, will American manufacturing just raise their prices to match the tariffs and lump the profits into their executive bonuses. They deserve it after all for being smart enough to raise prices.

[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 26 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

American manufacturing CAN'T, it would take years, decades honestly, to get back the capacity to make all the crap we've outsourced to other countries.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 21 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

And this is the absolute brain rot fantasy of tariffs that I keep explaining to these idiots, and keep getting blank stares or awkward silences.

Tariffs are 100% punitive, without a domestic/alternative sourcing strategy. They can work long term to reduce a foreign nation's competitive advantage in an industry while allowing a domestic industry space to exist, but that only works if there’s a domestic industry that already exists (at enough scale to meet demand) or a long term government program to nurture and build those industries - education/vocation training, regulatory concerns, infrastructure development, raw materials availability, etc

Tariffs Chinese steel/electronics/machine tools/etc into oblivion? Either buy the imported at a high price, or buy the domestic at a slightly less high price - but the cost is always carried by the consumer no matter what.

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 2 points 20 minutes ago

And they want to kill the CHIPS act, which was going to build some of that local supply.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 49 minutes ago

And beyond that, it will incentivize further automation rather than more blue collar jobs.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 2 points 58 minutes ago (1 children)

This is largely accurate unfortunately. A good example is Apple. They tried to make a high-end desktop computer manufactured in the US. To do this they needed a specific type of screw. In the area near their factory, they only found one machine shop that could make the screw and they could guarantee an output of 50 screws per day after a 3 week lead time to tool up. And that was the final offer.

When they finally moved to China, they submitted the same request. Multiple vendors appeared offering thousands of screws per day and if they wanted to place a bigger order the company would set up a new factory just to produce those screws and could output tens or hundreds of thousands per day depending on requirements.

Another example is the iPhone and Gorilla Glass. There were a few Chinese companies in the running to manufacture the glass panel that would go on top of the phone. The one that got the contract, in anticipation of getting the contract, had already purchased the machine to form the glass and had samples ready for inspection at the contract signing.

We have allowed our business climate to become so bogged down in red tape and liability and lawyers and insurance, that most American companies are simply unable to execute at the same speed as China when it comes to manufacturing.

I would absolutely love to get more manufacturing back in the US. But the process of outsourcing is not going to get unwound overnight. It took two decades to move everything to China, even if the whole country agreed that was a mistake it would take another two decades to bring it back. Because as the Apple screws demonstrate, it's not just about the factory that produces the widget. It's about everything that goes into that factory, the companies that make the parts and the screws and the plastic. When you deal with China, they are all right there and they are all ready to go. Same can't be said for the US.

[–] Tonguewaxer@lemmy.world 1 points 42 minutes ago

I was sorta on board until you blamed regulations as a reason businesses can't have manufacturering I. The US.

Regulations are written in blood. Stop pretending like a living wage and no slave labor is a bad tbi g inhibiting production.

Tarrif the snot out of the slave wage countries.

[–] dgmib@lemmy.world 4 points 57 minutes ago

During his first term Trump put a tariffs on Washing Machines. The price of imported washing machines went up. The price of domestically manufactured washing machines was also raised. Even the price of dryers — which didn’t have a tariff — went up on both imported and domestically manufactured appliances.

I have yet to see an economist that thinks Trumps tariff plans will benefit the working class.

[–] coriza@lemmy.world 26 points 2 hours ago

If.some other countries are any indication, not only will they raise the prices but they will raise it way more than the tariffs and just blame on tariffs and with time people will just think that is they way it is. "X cost 3 times as other countries? That is because the tariffs" no mind that the tariffs is like 50% and not 300%. Like they already do with gas prices. Gas go up immediately when oil prices rise but only goes down, if ever, for new stock.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 20 points 2 hours ago

That is exactly what US steel did in response to the steel tariffs back in Trump round one.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

I think you guys know.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Haha number go up again

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 31 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Everything he will do contributes to anger, division and the collapse of the United States.

[–] NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 2 hours ago

People will be angry but angry at the wrong people. No, let's not be angry at the guy for actively destroying everyone's lives. Let's be angry at blacks. Or gay people. Or transgenders. Or police. Or scientists.

Fucking dumb Americans.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

How about "fuck the idiot who thinks tariffs are paid for by anyone except the consumer." Your money is going to be worth a lot less over the next 4 years because a moron doesn't understand how tariffs work.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, we should be paying tarrifs from goods imported from countries with terrible labor laws.

But we also need social services like UBI to provide free housing and food and clothing.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

No matter how you slice it, it simply ends in America's living with a "lowered" quality of life. The reason we buy things from overseas is because it was cheaper and nobody wanted to pay for the expensive American version. Even the current high-end American products we have will find themselves struggling when people have to pick and choose what they can afford going forward.

I'm also a little indifferent about the whole thing. I just think its going to be hilarious if it goes down and people end up struggling even more after voting Trump. I'll have my schadenfreude-popcorn ready constantly to munch on over the next four years.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Lowering your quality of life when that wealth is stolen, built on the backs of oppressed people, or causing climate change is both necessary and just

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

I feel you, but also, they'll have less money too. Some of them will lose jobs and go hungry in the interim, and I'm not going to try to argue where the "appropriate" starvation balance is. But it -will- happen.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 39 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

There are two bright sides to this (and dark sides as well):

-This will decrease demand of Chinese goods in the U.S., hurting a country that is ... problematic to say the least. (Anyone remember the Uyghurs? The O.G. Gazens?) It probably won't shift demand back to the U.S. factories, but maybe it is time for another country to become the slave-labor-ish manufacturing capital of the world.

-When the prices skyrocket, along with food from all the missing immigrant farm hands, Trump will get blamed. I just hope this wasn't the plan all along and those "fake" inflation hikes back after covid weren't to cover for the real ones down the road.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 3 hours ago

Trump will get blamed

Oh honey...

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 46 points 3 hours ago

Trump will get blamed

Ha, ha, ha, he will blame Biden, or immigrants, and his moron supporters will believe him just like they have when he lied the other thousands of times.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Trump will get blamed

Like they blamed him for his COVID-19 response?

If that didn't get through... honestly, I have no idea what would. Americans are just stuck in their feeds and divorced from reality now.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

They're planning on 10-20% tariffs on all imports. China is 60%.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 63 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

When the prices skyrocket, along with food from all the missing immigrant farm hands, Trump will get blamed.

i really hope you’re right, but i think that will most likely get blamed on biden “ruining the economy” in his last term, or something in that vein. a lot of trump voters get their news from fox news or directly from donald trump, and i can’t imagine either of those sources criticizing trumps economic policies.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Funny that we both posted the same concern at the same time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 32 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

When the prices skyrocket, along with food from all the missing immigrant farm hands, Trump will get blamed.

In all likelihood, only a small percentage of his voters will actually blame him for the predictable consequences of his tariffs. The rest of them will believe Trump when he blames it on Biden's economic policies that were put in place before Trump's second term. Our egos have a funny way of making us do mental gymnastics to avoid having to accept the idea of oneself being wrong.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 191 points 13 hours ago (7 children)

No shit.

This is literally in the first paragraph of every economics textbook when they talk about tariffs.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 108 points 12 hours ago (7 children)

Donald Trump didn't win the Presidency by reading textbooks.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 65 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

Pretty sure everyone was told this before the election.

Problem:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/education/2024/11/12/trump-election-win-college-educated-voters/76109508007/

"Harris outperformed Biden’s 2020 numbers among white voters with college degrees. Meanwhile, exit polling from NBC News gave Republicans a 9-point gain with voters who never attended college."

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I bet a big portion of that 9% shops at Walmart.

Would been smart for Wally’s bottom line to maybe tell their customers about this before the fucking election.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

They don’t care. The owners of Walmart are some of the richest people in the world. So like all rich people they just figure they’ll hike prices and people will still pay (and they’ll have to, because Walmart tends to drive all its competitors out of town).

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 18 points 9 hours ago

'I love the poorly educated', donald j trump, feb 2016.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 36 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

Thing is, basic economics is a high school subject, except:

"Sir, when am I going to have to know how tariffs work in the real world?"

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 85 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's a certainty, not a fucking "likelihood'. That's how they work.

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 51 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You mean there's no chance that Wal-Mart might choose to absorb the increased prices out of the goodness of their hearts? :o

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 56 points 12 hours ago

just like mexico paid for his 'wall'

load more comments
view more: next ›