this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
88 points (96.8% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3536 readers
244 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lung@lemmy.world 19 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Mmm yeah imma small brain here and say it cannot be won. There are nukes on subs traveling all over the ocean. Not to mention that the environmental damage and radiation will probably fuck up the world really bad no matter what. Did you know a single nuke in orbit would emp a whole continent and destabilize climate? Great, now you do

My question is "what does this mean for the nature of empires?" — can they no longer truly fall once they enter the nuclear era? How does civil war look?

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 23 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

a single nuke in orbit would emp a whole continent and destabilize climate

That's a bit overblown.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_Prime

We've done orbital tests before and while the effects are more than we expected, they are not continent crippling or climate destabilizing.

about 900 miles (1,450 km) away from the detonation point, knocking out about 300 streetlights, setting off numerous burglar alarms, and damaging a telephone company microwave link. The EMP damage to the microwave link shut down telephone calls from Kauai to the other Hawaiian Islands.

It's definitely not good, and there's a reason we all agreed not to do that anymore, but it's really more about the damage it does to satellites that hurts everyone, and the damage being too unstructured to be worth investigating too far.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

That was before we had microchips in everything, and the internet.
Today, an EMP would have vastly different effects.

[–] groet@feddit.org 2 points 17 minutes ago

If I remember correctly, EMP doesn't really work on very small devices. You need a "antenna" that is long enough to induce a strong enough current to fry your electronics. So anything connected to a long wire. The power grid is itself a huge antenna and will be completely destroyed but a small battery powered device will be unharmed.

[–] Contramuffin@lemmy.world 21 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

The point, as I understand it, is that nuclear war can be technically won by nuking the enemy to smithereens and tanking their nukes as best as possible. The concern here is that because this would technically count as a victory, that it is a battle tactic that elitist assholes in the government have no doubt considered using.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

It doesn't matter how well you can tank the enemy nukes when yours alone still fuck the climate and ruin the biosphere.

But yeah, some numpty with their head up their ass probably plans on ruling over the ashes.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Maybe you can take out the air fields and the silos before anything has left the ground, maybe, but the subs are already out at sea.

MIRV makes interception dubious...

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

MIRV doesn't deploy until after re-entry. Modern interception occurs mid course, in orbit.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

No more than 10 to 20 million killed, tops! Uh, depending on the breaks.

[–] frankenswine@lemmy.world 32 points 11 hours ago (4 children)
[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

The roaches, probably.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 55 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 45 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

My username is actually a Dr Strangelove reference, it's a brilliant movie.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 25 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

"Alright Colonel... Bat Guano, if that is your name..."

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 21 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Please, no fighting in the war room

[–] protist@mander.xyz 15 points 9 hours ago

I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion, and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

[–] Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago

"Gentlemen, there's no fighting in the war room!"

[–] astrsk@fedia.io 6 points 10 hours ago

Those who died before seeing it.