Only if you've been one of the people who abuse their staff, steal or have been banned Your face is scanned upon entry, it is then compared to that rogues gallery, if it doesn't match, the scan is deleted, if it flags against their rogues gallery, securty pays closer attention to you.

If its as they say, I have no issies with it . their is no corelation between who I am and the scan they took of me and its not in the Governemnts hands. I'd suggest a privacy commissioner audit would make more sense. We are scanned at aiports AND our data is stored, i have more concern about that

[–] quokka@aussie.zone 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm getting sick of having to explain to people that "i'Ve gOT noTHIng tO HiDE" is naive bullshit when this comes up

[–] Owljfien@lemm.ee 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't always work, but I ask if they shit with the door open. If they say no, I argue they have nothing to hide, everyone shits

[–] Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thats a strong point to make.

It probably smashes through that mental barrier people have between 'pOliTicAl' discussions and their personal lives in the most aggressive way. In an illustrative sense.

[–] Owljfien@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I just don't have a reply when some actual degen replies with "yes."

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Ask them if you can watch. Be very very creepily excited about it.

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

fwiw, personal privacy isn't the reason I close the door, it's consideration of others.

[–] NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.org 2 points 2 days ago

I distribute gas masks and ear protection

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 32 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Protection against organised crime" my arse you could give the fucking cops footage of someone breaking into your house and raping your hamster while shouting their full name and address and they still wouldn't do shit.

This is about floggable data

[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I don't think they were asking the cops to do anything, they just were refusing people service.

But I agree with your conclusion. If they weren't using the data for commercial reasons, they were using it as a deniable trial to see what they could get away with.

Fucking Coles is using Palantir and has their checkout face cameras, so I suspect in the wake of this we'll hear more about this sort of thing with other companies.

[–] eraitch@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Had no idea about this with Coles. Fark.

[–] quokka1@mastodon.au 1 points 3 days ago

@eraitch @zero_gravitas If you do use the self-checkouts there you can put a sticky dot over the camera as you approach it. They love it.
And their "AI" exit-gates on the self-checkout pen that shut if it doesn't think it saw you paying can get in the sea too.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

My example was to highlight how utterly ridiculous their 'reasons' for capturing the data in the first place were. Not to mention none of it would stand up in court as evidence. Bald faced lie

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I wonder what percentage of Australians will have stepped into a Bunnings over the past three years? It has to be above 90% of us, right? That's pretty close to a record of us all.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 8 points 3 days ago

It's all wesfarmers, and i'm pretty fucking sure that shit doesn't stop at bunnings stores.

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's only 63 stores though. Not all of them

[–] wildwhitehorses@aussie.zone 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is now rolled out to all Bunnings stores. So now when you steal something they don't apprehend you, they store the footage and once you steal enough to get the cops involved they dump all that footage on the cops desk. People think they get away with stealing, time says otherwise.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, but this is about facial recognition, not an AI that can figure out if someone is shoplifting? They don't pay someone to sift through all that footage and note down when someone is actually stealing, that just doesn't happen. Let alone that the cameras don't have full coverage of the store. So your statement is just not accurate.

[–] wildwhitehorses@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So I worked at Bunnings and you're right and wrong.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 days ago

I have never worked at bunnings, and you're also right and wrong.

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 days ago

So ahhh, the massive fine?

Did they even get a wrist slap?

[–] Railison@aussie.zone 4 points 3 days ago

No thanks to the federal government beefing up privacy legislation.

[–] guillem@aussie.zone 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Does anyone know whether they published the ordered statement and where?

[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Article says they've got 30 days to publish it, and also that they're planning to appeal, so that might delay it further.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

The real question is...does this apply to my dog too?

[–] Matty_r@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago

If possible, support your local small businesses.