this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
21 points (95.7% liked)

United Kingdom

4105 readers
154 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zante 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Has to be bankrupted and nationalised now.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 19 points 5 days ago
[–] GoodShowSir@feddit.uk 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"Saving" all that money... then forking out 9.5 million on yearly executive bonuses...

[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Quick calculation: that’s ~£98.3k per person in the Thames Valley area.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Thames Valley area

Just FYI: Thames water covers a larger population than that. Much of London is not technically in the Thames valley.

EDIT: I'll add. It's anecdotal, as I can't remember when or where I read it. But I seem to remember a Thames water complaint a good while back. That much of the older London area they cover has not been worked on for over 100 years. And is listed such that the cost is beyond them.

Not sure if I buy it given modern techniques etc. But I'm no expert.

[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You’re absolutely right. Thames water claim 16 million customers, so that brings it down to a much more manageable £14,375 per customer, based on us getting shafted equally.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 5 points 5 days ago

Huge saving. LOL, a bit like saying don't worry your only going to die of a bullet, we save the rockets for the big boys.