this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
123 points (97.7% liked)

World News

39102 readers
3695 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The U.S. has approved Ukraine’s use of long-range ATACMS missiles to strike inside Russia, drawing sharp criticism from Russian officials, who warn of serious escalation and even invoke fears of World War III.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov condemned the move as a “new spiral of tension,” while Vladimir Putin has yet to comment.

Putin previously warned such actions could be seen as NATO’s direct involvement in the war.

As Biden’s term ends, speculation rises about how Trump’s more cautious stance on Ukraine aid might influence Moscow’s next steps.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sakychu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If they are really fearing ww 3 they could just withdraw 🤷‍♀️

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

It's not them that "fear" WW3. Well, they are scared shitless of it of course. But the "WW3" is a scaremongering tactic that kremlin trolls use all the time. That and the "okay you go to trenches and fight!!!!!" terminating cliche. You can tell someone is a paid bot when the first thing they do is say this shit.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sometimes constraints like Biden's remaining time in power are a good thing so necessarily bold and irreversible moves can be made to resolve the situation

[–] riplin@lemm.ee 30 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

The situation won’t be resolved until Russia has truly been broken or Ukraine has nukes. They will not stop until they have what they want at any cost or they perceive Ukraine as a credible threat.

Long range missiles are great, but Ukraine needs to really break them or they will just keep going.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Can't the US just give Ukraine the nukes, didn't Israel steal their nuclear program from the US anyway (like physically stole shit or something)

[–] zante 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Could you think about what you are suggesting please.

[–] sepi@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He thought about it. It's a great idea cos russia does not have working nukes. I know everybody gonna come tell me the braindead thing about "how it only takes one nuke", but russia has nothing that works. They don't even have working delivery vehicles. Their last sarmat test blew up on the launcher.

[–] zante -4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I guess I’ve got no option but to yield to your superior knowledge of Russia nuclear weaponry and its operational readiness.

I will also have to concede that your plan to manage the consequences of breaching the Non Proliferation Treaties, although not included in your comment, are surely water tight .

And for these reasons, the risks of transferring nuclear weapons to a corrupt oligarchy like Ukraine I’m sure have been considered and mitigated.

Because like you said, he thought about it .

[–] sepi@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Did you get your "ehrmagherd kurrupt ukrainian oligarchy" talking points from the garbage russians? This is a rhetorical question cos I know that's where you got it from. You've done less thinking of your own and are just spouting what you heard some propaganda outlet say, cos you just repeat stuff you hear.

Anyway, I rate giving Ukraine nukes a 15/10 idea. I think Ukraine should nuke russia. And you should watch.

[–] zante -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You are desperately in need of an argument on this, aren’t you ?

Start here

https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023

Get an adult to help you with the numbers.

[–] sepi@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

There's no need for an argument. I'm right.

[–] Dutczar@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

How is Ukraine a corrupt oligarchy? Seems to be as much as every other country in the world, probably less than the USA and Russia

(Edit: Using the definition that it's just a government controlled by a small group of people)

[–] zante 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What do you mean “how is it ?”

Just google it mate.

[–] Dutczar@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 days ago

It says the oligarchs were losing power for the last decade, especially after the start of the war and some "anti-oligarch" laws...

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 19 points 5 days ago

NK deployed troops on the ground VS Ukraine has got a little pass on their limits of how to use western arms. Yeah.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Leonid Slutsky

uncontrollable giggling

Leonid Slutsky! Making copies! The slutsky! Slut-a-rooni!

[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago