this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
110 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3423 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It was a provisional victory for the Biden administration, whose climate initiatives have been stymied. A challenge to the rule at issue is still moving through a lower court.

I'll note that a Trump administration would likely repeat its previous actions, and roll back these rules.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This literally is their job, so I guess I am glad the corrupt supreme court will allow them to do their job.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

… for now

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

Yes, it is. However, the facists believe that the epa, along with several other agencies, are illegal/unconstitutional. Their ultimate goal is to have these agencies disbanded all together. Until then, they are trying to make them as ineffective as possible. It is surprising that the fascist court broke with that ideology.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So is this how we're going to need to pass regulations now that Chevron deference is dead?

What a fucking joke

[–] silence7 2 points 1 month ago

Pretty much, unless we're able to substantially alter the makeup of the Supreme Court.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago

New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for New York Times:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/16/us/supreme-court-epa-emissions.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Sk4.WWLa.kzvAJLkoIncM
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/19/climate/epa-coal-emissions.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support