this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
62 points (97.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9797 readers
217 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/19969965

The Ontario government is considering bringing forward legislation that could prohibit the installation of bike lanes when lanes for motor vehicles are removed as a result, sources say.

Siemiatycki said "this government has signalled that the car is king," pointing to prior steps the governing Progressive Conservatives (PCs) have taken to ease costs for drivers.

He sees the PCs as making a clear play for the votes of motorists, and believes the policy would also appeal to many drivers frustrated with congestion on the roads.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago

These entitled assholes have no fucking clue about how congestion works or anything else. Continuing to enable (in the addiction sense) cars will only make congestion and costs spiral out of control even more until there's nothing left but a bankrupt Hellscape of dysfunctional sprawl.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Jesus fucking Christ. And these fuckers would win a reelection today.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Terminal case of carbrain. Literally incapable of thinking it through.

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Where else would the lanes go? Do they plan on paving over more poor people's homes for them?

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago

It's to discourage removing the lanes. You could still remove them, but not if the reason is to allow for a bike lane.