this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
319 points (99.1% liked)

Programming

17486 readers
109 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] amenji@programming.dev 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

But open-source doesn't always mean working for free, nor does it mean people do it for purely ethical (or socialist?) reason.

There are lots of reason why open-source is attractive after discounting ethics and money. I imagine being credited for being a major contributor to a popular open-source project would mean better job opportunity in the competitive tech job market. The gig doesn't directly offer you money, but it does gravitate the right company that has the money to fund your work they find very valuable. In a sense, this isn't that far from how capitalism work -- credits are due to the people who brings most value to the society, whether the source of the software are open to all or not.

This is of course a very superficial statement to make, but I remember Eric Raymond wrote about this in more a detailed (and more convincing!) manner in The Cathedral and the Bazaar.

[–] Ava@beehaw.org 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

big flashback to my freelance days.

fuck working for free in the hopes the project magically becomes super relevant overnight, and all the people who defend this.

if you want me to take on more responsability than i want to, you better be paying me.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

open-source doesn't always mean working for free,

Sponsorship brings goal conflicts, and locks both sponsor and sponsee into a death spiral of software like a dog with one true master and a master who can never get a new dog until this one is dead.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

So what? The point of open source is that you get the source to do with what you want, not "give me shit for free".