this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
3 points (80.0% liked)

Public Freakout

2491 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This link goes to Reddit, however, we have used a direct video link to avoid giving them ad revenue.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't understand how he didn't wind up in jail for contempt during this sentencing phase. In civil trials, Texas has a trial phase and a sentencing phase. Jones didn't provide documentation he was required to provide and basically didn't participate in the trial phase. As a consequence he was found "guilty by default" and they moved on to the sentencing phase.

During the sentencing phase he kept telling the jury that he was innocent despite having been found guilty. He continuously spoke to the press to talk about all of the evidence he wasn't being allowed to present and how he wasn't being allowed to defend himself. He had a chance to do that but decided not to.

He even called the judge a "tyrant" where she could hear him.

I don't understand how he didn't get at least a little jail te for contempt. I also don't get how he still has money flowing well enough to continue running his business. It's mid boggling what this guy gets away with.

[–] leftenddev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The judge knew that he would want that. AJ's whole bread and butter is persecution fetish. He wanted a fire to draw media attention and eyes on infowars for traffic revenue, and to use it as a prop that he's being directly attacked by the justice system for "the truth". The judge did not give him what he wanted and let him make a fool of himself fishing for a reaction like the petulant child and bully he is. This also makes it that much harder for any appeal on her decision to succeed from his team, since by all accounts, she clearly wasn't going as hard at him as she could have, so the ruling looks more than fair

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, you're probably right on all counts. Contempt charges are only an effective deterant if the person is scared of being charged with contempt. In this case, contempt charges were probably what Alex was aiming for and the judge was smart enough to not play his game.

The fact that changing Alex with contempt could lead some to think the judge was biased makes me think that, maybe, there should be another way for contempt charges to be levied. Maybe the presiding district court should be able to step in when circumstances dictate. I know that's probably a dumb idea for many reasons.

load more comments (2 replies)