this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
1353 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

59582 readers
4032 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I hope people finally quit that shit of a browser.

[–] ours@lemmy.film 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I groaned hearing Louis Rossmann recommending Brave during one of his videos about Youtube ads. Firefox uBlock Origin and SponsorBlock would be a better recommendation.

[–] XpeeN@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

or just librewolf \ Mull that comes with uBO already installed, if he don't want to let his users (that are probably techie, so idk why) install add-ons by themselves. Otherwise, I can't find a single reason of using brave lol

[–] crystal@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Brave provides a good balance between features and privacy for normal users.

I think many users will be uncomfortable with Mull and especially Librewolf.

(I personally use Mull but since it's limited in functionality I sometimes have to switch to a more fully featured browser, that browser being Brave.)

[–] XpeeN@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

I really have no idea why they're limited in functionalities I think the only website that didn't work for me on mull is instagram (fuck it anyway). And librewolf portable solved the no updates for me (although there is an addon for letting u know about updates), while letting me back up my data more easily

[–] ours@lemmy.film 2 points 1 year ago

Looks neat, but it still depends on Firefox so I don't mind supporting Firefox which is our last bastion against a Chrome monopoly.

[–] _pete_@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (11 children)

As a web developer the problem I have is there are issues with all the browsers that are available today:

  • Chrome and Edge are owned by big companies and report god-knows-what back to their motherships whilst constantly pushing their own services
  • Firefox uses its own rendering engine so it can have some Firefox specific bugs / differences that might be missed, plus doesn’t have support for some of the extensions that you want
  • Safari doesn’t have windows or extensions support
  • Opera is full of random features and promotional bumpf that I don’t care about and have to turn off
  • Vivaldi is a complicated beast that takes a bunch of work to set up, it also includes a mail client, calendar and feed reader in the browser which I don’t need.
  • DuckDuckGo doesn’t have any extension support at all
  • Arc is really fiddly and doesn’t always behave how I want it to (bookmarks behave like tabs for some reason)
  • Brave pulls things like this and is also full of crypto/wallet type stuff, plus you can’t even change your home page.

I just want a simple Chromium browser that doesn’t require me to turn a bunch of shit off, is private by default and supports extensions, I don’t think it’s too much to ask!

[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a web developer you should really take a look at Firefox developer eidition. It comes with very nice features for web developers and you are always at the edge of new things FF will support so you see things that will come soon to the rest of the Firefox users.

[–] _pete_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Normally I would agree with you, but I often need to use the Postman Interceptor extension which is only on Chromium browsers

[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Workflow differs from person to person. Not sure what that extension does or why it's needed, but I guess you are use to it.

[–] uzay@infosec.pub 7 points 1 year ago

Check out ungoogled-chromium. It needs some extra work to get extensions (and probably drm stuff) to work, but has good defaults otherwise.

[–] SloganLessons@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Safari doesn’t have windows or extensions support

Actually, it does have extensions. You can download them through app store in both iOS and Mac OS.

But it is more limited compared with chromium and firefox environment, and most known extensions in those don't exist for safari, although there are usually alternatives with other names

[–] Z4rK@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I guess you do get 3-4 questions when you install Vivaldi, like do you want tabs on top, should it import anything, and do you want to use mail and calendar too or just browser.

But “a complicated beast” to set up? No, it works like any other browser right out of the box. It offers advanced customization if you want to dive into them though.

[–] AaronMaria@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

If you want you can just use Vivaldi like any other browser, I would think, what is there that needs to be set up that doesn't in other browsers?

[–] Thorned_Rose@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm an ex website designer/dev and only tinker with websites these days. But I was doing this shit back in the days when HTML 4.01 was new. Anyways it was usual to use a bunch of tricks to get multiple different browsers (including different versions) to render the same or similar enough. I had to have a bunch of different browsers installed to test them all on because emulation wasn't a thing yet either.

I think the last serious development I did was a few years ago but as browsers have become better at adhering to standards and rendering more consistently, I haven't had the need to use anywhere near the amount of tricks and hacks as I used to. I've personally had little issue with browser compatibility.

Has something happened in the last few years to change that?

[–] buzziebee@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Firefox performs as well as chrome 99.8% of the time. The problem is chromium keep implementing things that haven't gone through the spec process fully yet. This causes the following situation:

The other browsers don't implement half baked privacy violating features which Google decides will be a new web API despite objections. Developers build features on their sites using that half baked crap. Users try to use the new features on Firefox and kick off about "Firefox specific bugs" because they haven't implemented non standard APIs.

Safari is its own kettle of fish though and causes a lot of drama. Recently they've caught up a lot in terms of support for most standard features developers want. However there's a big issue with supporting iOS Safari - it's version is tied to the iOS version of the phone. So users with older phones will be stuck forever on older versions of Safari with breaking bugs for things like flexbox. If you're in a market with lots of older phones then you have to spend a lot of time ensuring you support that older browser version. iOS Safari is the new internet explorer.

[–] Thorned_Rose@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Thank you for this explanation! I was so confused by people saying Firefox causes problems because my experience and AFAIK, Firefox adheres to standards the most. I always had the easiest time with Firefox and always built sites using Firefox then tricks to make other browsers work the same. Maybe it's because as a designer/dev I have always been more particular about sticking to standards.

iOS Safari is the new internet explorer.

sigh And here I thought after how many decades of standards, we would be past this shit by now. <insert rant about monopolising big corps forcing their moneygrubbing crap on people>

[–] XpeeN@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any chromium based browser will force manifest v3 on you though, keep that in mind.

[–] DeflectedBullhorn@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One point for Brave, is that they have specifically said they will continue to support Manifest v2 in their browser.

[–] XpeeN@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

That's nice. still not worth it tho lol

[–] 68silver@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I have changed the homepage on brave plenty of times.

[–] Bruncvik@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Firefox uses its own rendering engine so it can have some Firefox specific bugs / differences that might be missed, plus doesn’t have support for some of the extensions that you want

I used to do QA for a Web portal, and issues with Firefox not scaling .svg files properly was driving me up the wall. There were more obscure issues, but this one was so basic that I couldn't believe we still had to have a separate code for Firefox browsers.

Why even make shit for Chromium? Fuck everyone using Chromium.

[–] g0nz0li0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Arc has been pretty good for me so far. But the challenge will be at what point they stop stuffing it with new ideas, and will that be before it turns into a bloated mess. Edge is a great example of this.

[–] _pete_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yea, I really liked Edge when it was first launched, clean fast and simple. These days there is so much shoe-horning of Microsoft integrations it just feels like they’re desperately trying to steal all of your personal information

Arc could be amazing but there are some features which just don’t work as I would expect.

[–] g0nz0li0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It’s quirky, for sure. The easel feature isn’t at all integrated which I find odd.

I refuse to use Chrome and I use Firefox for work since 99% of my time is on that.

Got any alternatives to use?

[–] Aradina@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

If Brave redirecting users to use their affiliate links without consent didn't make people stop using it, I doubt this will.

[–] gogosempai@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

On Firefox. But I do like Brave Search over something like DDG, their AI summarizer is quite good.

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think Librewolf is a much better option. BUT, I'm glad that at least Brave is taking a stance against Google. (the enemy of my enemy sort of thing). I hope all these firms are sued into following the proper copyright though.

Brave sucks Google dick by using Chromium like everyone else.