this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
1497 points (90.4% liked)

Political Memes

5483 readers
3213 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

ITT: “Yeah but it’s their job to ‘appeal’ to me; it’s not my job to vote for them, and I gotta say ‘not the end of democracy’ isn’t a big selling point for me tbh. Dance for me, candidate! Dance!”

[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 22 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Imagine politicians actually trying to get elected. How absurd would that be?

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev -4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

OP: These framings we see in the media have absolutely nothing to do with which candidate is more qualified to run the country

Me: Actually I would add to that that these framings are specifically inserted into the discourse by corporate media to elevate some candidates and depress some candidates, with the depressingly effective aim of making people dislike the corporate unfriendly candidates

Posters ITT: Hey like 20 or 30 of us have the exact same new framing we’d like to present that has nothing to do with which candidate is more qualified to run the country. It might be a much much better framing than, which candidate is better to vote for, or factual things about the candidate’s record. We all feel that exact same way about it being important to look at it this way.

[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You can have the best product in the universe, but if you can't sell it, then it doesn't matter. When trying to argue a douche is better than a turd, you really need your presentation going. None of the American politicians (except maybe Bernie) are remotely qualified to run a country of any size, so stop trying to make it about who is the most qualified.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is like saying that if you go to a restaurant, and the food tastes like shit, it's the customers' fault.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Holy Jesus is this a flawed analogy. I'll try to fix it for you:

If you go to a restaurant where for some reason every present customer votes for a cook out of a lineup of cooks who each only prepare certain dishes, and out of which only two are consistently popular enough to get the majority of customers to vote for them.

Out of these two, both let the manager pick the dishes. But one only makes meals out of tofu, which isn't terrible but not worth going out for, and the customers only vote for him because they're afraid it's the only choice that will beat the other guy. The other cook just scrapes and serves the sludge off the bottom of the stove but has run a successful decades-long campaign to convince their customers that sludge tastes better than tofu. None of those customers have ever tried tofu so they don't know better.

Despite the fact that it's obvious that the issue with this system is overwhelmingly the manager running a shitty restaurant and the cooks pitting the customers against each other, the small but vocal subset of customers who just want a steak are blaming the other customers like it's their fault.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"The candidate has done nothing to earn my vote, so I'm not voting for them."

"wtf why aren't people voting for the candidate I support?! They must just hate everyone and be a fascist since they can't see the obvious righteousness of my candidate"

These people never realize that this is a two way street. If candidates are going to earn votes, that means their candidate has to earn votes too and not just accept them for granted. They have to build bridges to achieve their goals. You can tell that those burning bridges don't actually care about their espoused virtues -- they just want to be right and stick it to their enemies.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah. Plus the continuation of that conversation tends to go:

"Okay. He raised literally about a trillion dollars via corporate tax increases, which he then spent on climate change and working people, achieving incremental but quite significant results."

"Yeah but did he OVERTURN CAPITALISM AND AMERICAN IMPERIALISM? Because if not PROJECT 2025 BECOMES ALL THE DEMOCRATS FAULT"

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

AMERICAN IMPERIALISM

Ironically most of these people also tend to make arguments in favor of Russian imperialism when they talk about how NATO is actually to blame for the war and Ukraine should accept a peace agreement.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 points 5 months ago

Almost as if...

I asked one of them randomly earlier what they think of the war in Ukraine, and they don't want to discuss it, just keep talking to me about Joe Biden