Technology

59559 readers

3580 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

441

Intel’s Anti-Upgrade Tricks Defeated With Kapton Tape (hackaday.com)

submitted 5 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

51 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000498114.pdf

Soviet Computer Technology: Little Prospect for Catching Up

We believe that there are many reasons why the Soviets trail the United States in computer technology:

The Soviets' centrally-planned economy does not permit adequate flexibility to design or manufacturing changes frequently encountered in computer production; this situation has often resulted in a shortage of critical components

especially for new products.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

If you're only response to criticism of capitalism is ((communism)), you may just be a cog in the corporate propaganda machine.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

I mean they went with a literal cia link.

[–] GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for the link to the unbiased study by... the CIA? Huh. Yeah I trust them.

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The paper was from 1985. Was the CIA correct?

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Marginally. The paper analyzes the capabilities as they existed in the 1980s, but doesn't draw strong conclusions as to why that may be. It does demonstrate how reliance on central planning results in inadequaciea when said central planning is not operating well, though.

The paper doesn't really mention it but the central planning of the USSR was actively reeling from Brezhnev dying, Andropov dying, and Chernenko either dying or about to die at the time the CIA thing was written. So yeah, correct is an accurate if imprecise way to put it.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah it’s more a criticism of the ussr in the 80s. Central planning with more tech focus and more democracy would likely not face that specific issue.

But also there’s room for shit like kanban communism which definitely wouldn’t have these problems