this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
569 points (96.4% liked)

News

23367 readers
4458 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Alexander Smith’s PowerPoint presentation doesn’t appear designed to court controversy. The slides, focused on declining maternal health in Gaza, cite public health data from the United Nations and World Health Organization. His employer, the U.S. Agency for International Development, had selected him to share it at the government agency’s Global Gender Equality Conference.

But just before the conference, an issue of contention emerged.

A single slide mentioned international humanitarian law in context of the health crisis in Gaza. USAID staff cited the slide and discussion of international law as potential fodder for leaks, documents and emails Smith shared with The Intercept show. Despite Smith’s willingness to make revisions, his presentation was eventually canceled. On the last day of the conference, he found himself out of a job.

“I thought it is really obscene that misinformation can go out freely out into the world [about Gaza], but I can’t talk about the reality of starving pregnant women,” said Smith, who worked as a contracted senior adviser at USAID on gender and material health. “We can’t even whisper about that in a conference on that topic.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] exanime@lemmy.today 103 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ah the land of the free

BTW, this is a real violation of free speech... Negative consequences from the government for speaking... Even in the context of your own work responsibility

[–] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (3 children)

No, it's not, the governemnt can censor its own workers or speech that its workers make. The government can censor itself.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He didn't even make the speech. Nothing he did could be considered misconduct or insubordination.

[–] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

A government employee will be censored for the speech that that employee puts out, full stop.

Same way as if that employee put out a hate filled speech about gay people.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 6 points 5 months ago

True, but in this case he hadn't even put it out at all yet.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Did you even read my comment?

[–] jwt@programming.dev 0 points 5 months ago

Aside from the correctness of the ruling or this situation. I'm guessing if Citizens United ruled 'money equals speech', then making/distributing a powerpoint probably also will be categorized as 'speech'.

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

It's a violation of free speech, it's just not a violation of US law. Free speech is not the first amendment.

[–] exanime@lemmy.today 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

So Americans only have free speech when the government says it's ok?

I'm mean, I know freedom of speech is a narrower concept than most people realize but if the government can retaliate against you because you would share factual evidence as part of your job, then you guys really don't have freedom of speech

I mean, I guess you guys beat North Korea in this topic and .... That's about it

[–] LordGimp@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago

It's more like when you work for the government, you're allowed to say what in a personal context. Once you start throwing around a title linked to the government, you're no longer speaking as yourself, youre speaking as the government. The government can tell you what the government is allowed to say.

It's the difference between an employee of the coast guard joining Greenpeace vs. That employee publicly saying the United States Coast Guard is joining Greenpeace. The coast guard can't fire an employee for their own political beliefs, but they can totally fire a guy for saying shit the coast guard doesn't want while representing the coast guard. Public speaking and seminars and shit like this have explicit rules about who can say what and when as a government employee in an official capacity.

[–] Vivendi@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago

Free Speech™*

*(Available only for the bourgeoisie ruling class. Terms and conditions may apply)

[–] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The US government can not censor speech for private citizens except in extremely limited terms.

This is a government employee communicating on behalf of the government. The government has every right to censor the speech that it puts out.

Also, for what it's worth, the US has much stronger free speech protections than the EU. Whether or not that's a good thing is up for debate.