this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
250 points (96.3% liked)

Games

16796 readers
748 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
250
Star Citizen Pushes Through the $700 Million Raised Mark and No, There Still Isn’t a Release Date (www.ign.com)
submitted 5 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The buyers remorse game. Just give them a tiny bit more money and then a bit more and another, then the game will release, eventually, maybe, hopefully. Please release the game, we spend so much money on it. Here, take more money, we hope that helps. What, you need more? Okay, next quarter. We can't stop spending now guys or the money was all wasted.

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 35 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sunken cost fallacy: the game.

[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

True, sunken cost is the correct terminology. That's what I mean.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Uh-huh, and devs are incentivised to keep that fallacy up, because the release would mean that ships bought for in-game currency will not be wiped every something update.

Yes, right - the only ships that currently persist are the ones bought for real money. And the devs have 0 incentive to change that, because players really end up buying the ships for cash (easily $300, $400, $1000 for a ship) instead of leaving such bullshit for good.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Jeez, I've spent less than that on cars in real life before.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Wait until you hear of $8000, $21000, and $54000 ship packages.

They are all real.