this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
857 points (99.9% liked)

196

16542 readers
2521 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lennard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 82 points 6 months ago (12 children)

Honestly it's fucked up how our school system treats children. We need to talk about racism but also about how children are not to be seen as some sort of human clay that we need to form into whatever we see fit.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 58 points 6 months ago (7 children)

It's not entirely clear what you're saying, but the sooner we acknowledge that children are inevitably formed by their environment and there's no "natural" way to let them somehow form themselves the sooner we can start discussing what is good to teach them and the correct way to do it.

[–] prunerye 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm not entirely sure what you're saying either, but nature vs nurture wasn't settled in nurture's favor. It's somewhere in between.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'll be honest, this doesn't really make sense as a response to my post. It wouldn't really matter where you or I fall on the nature vs nurture argument for my post to be relevant. (Unless one of us somehow believed it was entirely nature.)

[–] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think there was an implicit premise (intentional or not) in your statement about there being no natural way to let kids develop, and that's what they were commenting on.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Oh I see, I used the word natural and they made the connection to the the idea of nature vs nurture because it also uses nature. That makes sense.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)