this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
774 points (98.6% liked)

Political Memes

5483 readers
3499 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nah that'd be to woke.

And we all know how billionaires react to wokeness.

Also I feel like Taylor Swift would be the one to pull that card.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (3 children)

At least Taylor Swift actually goes on tours and can be said to do real work. Bezos makes over $2,500 per second and does essentially fuck-all. Opinions about Taytay’s music aside at least she has a positive impact on local economies and her product is bought by choice.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yeah but I feel like she'd be one of the first to defend her monetary status.

I've brought this up a lot lately but I liken her to the Beatles. The Beatles were being taxed at a 90+% rate. When they finally realized that they took it to court. The judge basically said "You were making so much money you didn't even realize you were being taxed. We're going to keep taxing you at the same rate and you can fuck off."

I could see Taylor doing the same thing if her tax rates went up to the level they should've been from the beginning.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 7 months ago

Wow, awesome on that judge. TIL

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Haha I didn’t know about that Beatles story but mad respect for the courts on that one.

I agree, she’d probably throw a bit of a fit, but at least we can consider her “working class” in contrast to the “owner class”. Like you say she should still be taxed heavily because obviously but at least she technically works for that money.

Like if any of the mega-rich CEOs was actually judged properly on the ability to do their job it’d be pretty clear that most of their decisions are bad for everything but their bottom line or actually made by lower paid employees. But take the money out of the Taylor Swift equation and at least she’s still going on tour and making music, albeit with a lot of production help and the like, but she at least does something.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

She's also part of the owning class. Her real estate net worth is 150 million. Fuck her.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

I’m still not sure which part of any of my comments said that she deserves to be obscenely wealthy to the point where she can have 150mil of real estate but go off I guess. I can see plenty of points where I agreed that she should have the tits taxed off of her, but…

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Goes on tour in a private jet as the most pollutant individual human on the planet.

Let stop cherry picking billionaires to simp.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

To clarify, I’m not saying it’s good but at the very least the money is earned because she does a thing and people get to choose to pay to participate in the concerts while no one is economically locked out of enjoying her music day-to-day.

In a situation where no billionaire can really be said to be ethical there is at least something to be said for the fact that she is, in some way, “working class”. She doesn’t sit around getting everyone to do every aspect of her job for her while she sits at home talking doing fuck-all. It’s fucked up that she isn’t taxed to hell and back like everyone else making that much money should be but it’s at least it’s fundamentally different.

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

First part fine. Yes nobody is forced to buy her music or strong arming an entire economy.

Second part is a whole lot of bull and is glorifying what little stuff she actually does. Oh look at her ride private jets and live a life of luxury while she spends a couple of hours singing between being carted off in a limo.

Calling celebrities “working class” is the most ridiculous thing I’ve read all day and I read a comment thinking that Trump would actually serve jail time.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Because we’ve decided that it goes “working class” > “Middle class” > “uppler class” which should already reveal the massive problem right there. In reality it’s either you work(or cannot for whatever reason and should be cared for by society) or you grift and act like anything heinous shit done is some sort of contribution to civilization.

Like it or not celebrities are still working class. They need to be taxed regardless of where their income comes from and yes, Taylor Swift doesn’t deserve private jet money or anything, but she can at least be said to work. It’s also true that the people who support her need to be able to afford their lives(I don’t know what they’re paid) and they absolutely should be getting a bigger piece of that pie.

[–] Hegar@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago

she has a positive impact on local economies and her product is bought by choice

So says every parasite though.