this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
576 points (93.9% liked)

News

23367 readers
3960 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Teachers describe a deterioration in behaviour and attitudes that has proved to be fertile terrain for misogynistic influencers

“As soon as I mention feminism, you can feel the shift in the room; they’re shuffling in their seats.” Mike Nicholson holds workshops with teenage boys about the challenges of impending manhood. Standing up for the sisterhood, it seems, is the last thing on their minds.

When Nicholson says he is a feminist himself, “I can see them look at me, like, ‘I used to like you.’”

Once Nicholson, whose programme is called Progressive Masculinity, unpacks the fact that feminism means equal rights and opportunities for women, many of the boys with whom he works are won over.

“A lot of it is bred from misunderstanding and how the word is smeared,” he says.

But he is battling against what he calls a “dominance-based model” of masculinity. “These old-fashioned, regressive ideas are having a renaissance, through your masculinity influencers – your grifters, like Andrew Tate.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Toxic masculinity is the reason for that as well. Being the victim is seen as being less masculine, which is seen as worthy of ridicule.

Toxic masculinity hurts everyone.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

When men do bad things: "this is toxic masculinity"

When women do bad things: "this is also toxic masculinity"

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

When men don't get the support they need. Or are ridiculed for feeling emotions other than anger. And don't feel they can cry without being judged.

Women can absolutely be abusers. That's called shitty people and has nothing to do with masculinity, toxic or otherwise.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Most men cry in front of a woman exactly once.

That's not toxic masculinity. It's toxic femininity and NO ONE is addressing it in a systemic way.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

In feminist theory "masculinity" and "femininity" don't mean "what men do" and "what women do" but value systems floating through society affecting people.

So in that sense yes woman can exhibit toxic masculinity, if they reinforce those shitty norms. Likewise men can exhibit toxic femininity... say, comparatively harmless example, by discouraging a tomboy from skating.

It's just one of those gazillions of instances where feminist terminology sucks absolutely donkeyballs because you need to read theory to understand it, which practically noone who calls themselves a feminist actually does, it's all vibes and signals very little analysis they abuse those terms just like the rest of the population. The rest of the population at least has an excuse, they're using the dictionary definition.

In this particular instance, "toxic (male) gender norm" would be much better.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It’s just one of those gazillions of instances where feminist terminology sucks absolutely donkeyballs

I mean, to get a little meta here, but if feminist theory essentially says "bad things are (toxic) masculinity, good things are femininity (feminism)" that betrays a deeper problem about the attitudes of feminist theorists, doesn't it? Sure, it's a terminology problem, but it's also a problem that those are the terms.

Calling something women do a "toxic male gender norm" is just as problematic.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

Sure, it’s a terminology problem, but it’s also a problem that those are the terms.

I've talked to academic feminists about this and their reaction was pretty much "there were good reasons to chose those terms, doing it this way makes sense in the overall theoretical framework, it's an academic term and not for general use, academic terms always get misunderstood that's not a thing limited to feminism". When asked whether, as an academic subject having its own political movement, and being, in the wider sense, sociologists, they shouldn't at least study the societal implications of their terminology: Crickets.

And I can't really blame them. The ones I talked with about this definitely have their heart in the right place, acknowledged all the issues but truth be told if one of them goes against those established terms which are oh so useful equivocations for many a catty bitch they'll get skinned alive by exactly those catty bitches.

[–] meat_popsicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

It’s called feminist studies - they’ll never say the thing they’re studying is or can be toxic. It’s always the masculine that’s bad, because the very subject name demands it.