this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
38 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59559 readers
3746 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Liz@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that second one not what you would do if you were trying to generate reviews that would pass automated checks? The hard part is deciding if the fake reviews were requested/bought/generated by Reddit or if they're an independent bot network trying to establish legitimacy or mask directed action.

[–] Kuinox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or just when there is a movement a protests there is always a bunch of people against the protest.
Bunch of redditors are pissed off that we ruin their addiction.
In the account I checked, somes had a selfie of themselves that werent indexed on google yet. To me it point out it's more likely a genuine account

[–] Liz@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The real people I'm not commenting on, I'm commenting on the bots. The question is why they're reviewing the Reddit app, and that's basically unknowable without an investigation well beyond my skill level and pay grade. They could be a bot network trying to build credibility or a bot network cashing out and leaving paid reviews.

[–] Kuinox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You seems to miss my point from the very beginning: I'm saying it's maybe not bots. Don't fall into confirmation bias.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're the one who said some of the reviews were copies of legitimate reviews! What else would that be besides bots? I'm not making any definite conclusions about why those bots are there, in fact I was trying to be explicit about the fact that we can't assume intent, but the bots are there.

[–] Kuinox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I did not said that. I said it was legit reviews OR bot impersonating users, and there is no easy way to tell.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

AH, I misunderstood what this meant, then:

The last time it was posted I investigated the reviews on Google play, and every rating was made by a real person, or a bot impersonating the real person. There is no way to tell appart except by contacting the person.

I read this to mean that you were finding duplicate reviews where one set seemed to be bots impersonating the other set. But, your comment clarifies what you meant. My bad.