this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
38 points (91.3% liked)

Solarpunk Travel

651 readers
1 users here now

Community for those focused on sustainable travel. Our society's current levels of energy intensive and frequent travel are not compatible with life on a finite planet. We advocate for long-term slow travel to see the world, and low energy local travel to deeply experience your community. Green washing free zone.

related to sustainable travel:

related to travel generally:

The communities listed above are decentralized. Centralized instances are omitted as they go against the fedi purpose and it’s better to cultivate digital rights in the free world. That means instances that have a disproportionately large population or are centralized on Cloudflare are not listed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CouldntCareBear@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I want to love the idea but surely these panels can't perform as well as one that doesn't need to be hardened enough to be a bike path. In which case we should only put solar panels in bike paths or roads after we've exhausted all other usable surfaces, like rooftops.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

These panels are specialized to be ridden on. Probally not worth diverting funding from more traditional solar surfaces, but if you want to put panels somewhere that is already goverment owned and is absolutely out in the sun, a bike path carrying 500lbs at most is likely a great place to put more panels.

[–] v81@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The act of making them so that can be ridden on significantly reduces their output.

Combined with laying flat instead of at a favourable angle... These solar paths and roadways are a terrible idea.... And I'm someone who loves solar.

EEVblog on YouTube goes into good detail about this.

[–] activistPnk 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

What no one mentions is how harmful concrete (cement) is for climate. I can’t see the pics on my connection but if these things are a substitute for concrete, that could be a plus in itself assuming the GHG of these panels is low.. Though I don’t suppose that’s necessarily the case.

[–] v81@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The energy required to produce the solar panels is huge, is even go as far to say worse than concrete.

The panels are usually embedded in a resin, or urethane or some plastic like material, extra thick too, to withstand the traffic over it.

All that combined with the reduced energy yeild from the compromised use situation... It's not great.

Solar on rooftops has far higher output per area. This better return somewhat offsets the energy that goes into them.