this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
576 points (93.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9662 readers
105 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I wonder how he thinks how supermarket shelves or the storage of his favorite restaurants are filled. He might be in for a surprise when no trucks will be delivering anything in the city. Or does he believe his local Tesco is getting it's wares by tube?

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 7 points 11 months ago

It's not clear from the way the article quotes him exactly what he said should be "ripped out completely". You seem to be interpreting it as "all city roads should be ripped out completely".

I suspect he's saying we could rip out many city roads, completely turning them into green spaces and with forms of more active transport. I don't think this is saying remove all roads to the extent goods vehicles can't enter.

[–] nodsocket@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Gasp how will we maintain capitalism if we can't exploit and pollute the earth?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So we simply dissolve cities instead? Without inflow of goods, workers, and customers cities are not able to survive.

[–] 768@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Goods:

Rail, tram, cargo bikes interconnected at re-implemented logistic centres.

Workers:

Public transport, (electric) bicycles

Customers:

Retail will change, but cities will not lose their function of overspecialisation.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Nice fantasy. Nobody will pay for the first, the second will be a complete illusion with the current state of public transport (and how you want to get people with 30+ km commute one way to bike, even electric, will remain an unsolved riddle). The only thing with the third is, you are right, it will change, I.e. it will kill off in-city retail completely.