this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
732 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

59559 readers
3618 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 149 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Can’t figure out how to feed and house everyone, but we have almost perfected killer robots. Cool.

[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 74 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh no, we figured it out, but killer robots are profitable while happiness is not.

[–] o2inhaler@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would argue happiness is profitable, but would have to shared amongst the people. Killer robots are profitable for a concentrated group of people

[–] Strobelt@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What if we gave everyone their own killer robot and then everyone could just fight each other for what they wanted?

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No the Republican plan would be to sell killer robots at a vastly inflated price to guarantee none but the rich can own them, and then blame people for "being lazy" when they can't afford their own killer robot.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Also, they would say that the second amendment very obviously covers killer robots. The founding fathers definitely foresaw the AI revolution, and wanted to give every man and woman the right to bear killer robots.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

They'd say they're gonna pass a law to give every male, property owning citizen a killer robot but first they have to pass a law saying it's legal to own killer robots. They pass that law then all talk about the other law is dropped forever. No one ever follows up or asks what happened to it. Meanwhile, the rich buy millions and millions of killer robots.

[–] MartinXYZ@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh no, we figured it out, but killer robots are profitable while ~~happiness~~ survival is not.

[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, it isn't just about survival. People living on the streets are surviving. They have no homes, they barely have any food.

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

obviously that's just a lifestyle choice

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

What's more important, a free workforce or an obedient one?

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Especially one that is made to kill everybody else except their own. Let it replace the police. I'm sure the quality controll would be a tad stricter then