this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
45 points (95.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5285 readers
766 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7
45
When Idiot Savants Do Climate Economics (theintercept.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by anzich@feddit.de to c/climate
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The report in which parts of the article is based

https://profstevekeen.substack.com/p/loading-the-dice-against-pension

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] lefaucet 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LOL Love that GDP!

Reminds me of a joke...

Two economists were walking through the woods talking about capital when, to make a point, the first economist points to a pile of bear crap and says, "I'll give you $1,000 to eat that pile of crap."

"Make it $5,000 and you got a deal."

The second economist feeling the cost benefit was in his favor ate the crap. And the first one agreed $5,000 would be paid.

A little further down the path they happened upon another pile of bear crap. The second economist offered to pay $5,000 if the first economist ate this pile.

The deal was made and the pile was eaten.

A few minutes later the first economist paused and said, "Hey... we're exactly where we were financially at the start of this walk but we both went through the pain of downing bear crap. What was the point?"

The second economist said, "Don't be ridiculous! We just grew the GDP by $10,000!"

[โ€“] Resonanz 1 points 1 year ago

OMG Love this joke!