this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
592 points (97.9% liked)

Memes

45727 readers
684 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 48 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I pass it to the n+1^th^ person. We can do this forever because integers is infinite.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

While integers are infinite, humans are not. Eventually the entire population of the earth would be on the tracks and nobody to flip the switch.

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do we consider intelligent aliens to be "person"? Because the universe is also infinite AFAIK

[–] TrippyTortuga@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most scientists agree it is finite.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do they? There’s broad consensus on the size of the observable part, but what’s beyond that is surely more speculation than science.

[–] rammer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Based on observations it seems that the universe curves in on itself. And is thus finite.

[–] primbin@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty the curvature of the universe has actually been measured to be very close to 0, within margin of error, which would suggest an infinite universe. (It doesn't prove it by any means, though. The curvature could just too small to measure.)

However, the observable universe is indeed finite, due to the speed of light being finite.

[–] AndyGHK@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

The entire population of the earth is already on the tracks with nobody to flip the switch, brother.

lights cigar

[–] Uriel238@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

It depends on if we develop the capacity to colonize off world, and the rate at which each test occurs. Even a one-lever-a-second rate would be out grown by the current population rate, and yet some limiters to population are catching up to us. So long as we can keep the population growth rate high (which involves securing food and habitat for the people) we can outrun the trolley into the forseeable future.

[–] schreiblehrling@beehaw.org 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Smart solution. Like this, no one ever gets killed but we need an infinite number of people on the switches.

[–] float@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Until you get to that one person that would like to end mankind way down the line.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

It just takes one.

[–] Uriel238@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

It's curious how they're selected. During the nuclear age we've had nukes in the hands of fanatics who hated the enemy, who were able to comprehend the gravity of their responsibility enough that not once did a nuclear tipped weapon get launched in error or against orders... or at all.

We're closing on eighty years without an atomic war. Not a small accomplishment. It's one of the few things that gives me hope for humanity.

[–] schreiblehrling@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

See? It just needs one asshole to end the world.

[–] catacomb@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If we can travel faster than the trolley, we could adjust all switches with one person who continues to travel to the next junction before the trolley arrives!

[–] Johanno@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

At this point some might question why you didn't buy a nuke in order to stop the trolley

[–] schreiblehrling@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Hell of a job, but yes 😆

[–] LSNLDN@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Horrible metaphor for life deep

[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

what about counting on an integer overflow to add moro humans so the overpopulation gets much worse