this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
661 points (88.4% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3234 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Like an estimated two-thirds of the world’s population, I don’t digest lactose well, which makes the occasional latte an especially pricey proposition. So it was a pleasant surprise when, shortly after moving to San Francisco, I ordered a drink at Blue Bottle Coffee and didn’t have to ask—or pay extra—for a milk alternative. Since 2022, the once Oakland-based, now Nestlé-owned cafe chain has defaulted to oat milk, both to cut carbon emissions and because lots of its affluent-tending customers were already choosing it as their go-to.

Plant-based milks, a multibillion-dollar global market, aren’t just good for the lactose intolerant: They’re also better for the climate. Dairy cows belch a lot of methane, a greenhouse gas 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide; they contribute at least 7 percent of US methane output, the equivalent emissions of 10 million cars. Cattle need a lot of room to graze, too: Plant-based milks use about a tenth as much land to produce the same quantity of milk. And it takes almost a thousand gallons of water to manufacture a gallon of dairy milk—four times the water cost of alt-milk from oats or soy.

But if climate concerns push us toward the alt-milk aisle, dairy still has price on its side. Even though plant-based milks are generally much less resource-intensive, they’re often more expensive. Walk into any Starbucks, and you’ll likely pay around 70 cents extra for nondairy options.

. Dairy’s affordability edge, explains María Mascaraque, an analyst at market research firm Euromonitor International, relies on the industry’s ability to produce “at larger volumes, which drives down the cost per carton.” American demand for milk alternatives, though expected to grow by 10 percent a year through 2030, can’t beat those economies of scale. (Globally, alt-milks aren’t new on the scene—coconut milk is even mentioned in the Sanskrit epic Mahābhārata, which is thousands of years old.)

What else contributes to cow milk’s dominance? Dairy farmers are “political favorites,” says Daniel Sumner, a University of California, Davis, agricultural economist. In addition to support like the “Dairy Checkoff,” a joint government-industry program to promote milk products (including the “Got Milk?” campaign), they’ve long raked in direct subsidies currently worth around $1 billion a year.

Big Milk fights hard to maintain those benefits, spending more than $7 million a year on lobbying. That might help explain why the US Department of Agriculture has talked around the climate virtues of meat and dairy alternatives, refusing to factor sustainability into its dietary guidelines—and why it has featured content, such as a 2013 article by then–Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, trumpeting the dairy industry as “leading the way in sustainable innovation.”

But the USDA doesn’t directly support plant-based milk. It does subsidize some alt-milk ingredients—soybean producers, like dairy, net close to $1 billion a year on average, but that crop largely goes to feeding meat- and dairy-producing livestock and extracting oil. A 2021 report by industry analysts Mintec Limited and Frost Procurement Adventurer also notes that, while the inputs for dairy (such as cattle feed) for dairy are a little more expensive than typical plant-milk ingredients, plant alternatives face higher manufacturing costs. Alt-milk makers, Sumner says, may also have thinner profit margins: Their “strategy for growth is advertisement and promotion and publicity,” which isn’t cheap.

Starbucks, though, does benefit from economies of scale. In Europe, the company is slowly dropping premiums for alt-milks, a move it attributes to wanting to lower corporate emissions. “Market-level conditions allow us to move more quickly” than other companies, a spokesperson for the coffee giant told me, but didn’t say if or when the price drop would happen elsewhere.

In the United States, meanwhile, it’s a waiting game to see whether the government or corporations drive down alt-milk costs. Currently, Sumner says, plant-based milk producers operate under an assumption that “price isn’t the main thing” for their buyers—as long as enough privileged consumers will pay up, alt-milk can fill a premium niche. But it’s going to take a bigger market than that to make real progress in curbing emissions from food.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] torknorggren@lemm.ee 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Except almonds. Almonds are terrible water wasters, and mostly grown in California where they can least afford the water.

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 69 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Still more efficient on resource utilization than animal agriculture. If you hate almond milk for that reason, you should want the dairy industry completely abolished.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Shit, you should want all animal agriculture banned.

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Eh, there are plenty of use cases where certain land types aren't really arable. Ruminants fill that niche easily.

The catch is that like 80% of the land used for livestock currently could also use crops instead.

https://freefromharm.org/agriculture-environment/saving-the-world-with-livestock-the-allan-savory-approach-examined/

Fwiw US dairy plans to be carbon neutral by 2050.

https://www.npr.org/2022/04/27/1095100351/the-dairy-industry-aims-to-be-carbon-neutral-by-2050-heres-what-it-means-for-far

[–] inasaba@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

But we don't need to use all that land. Plant-based diets use 70% less land, including 22% less crop land.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The bigger catch is that 70% of all crops we grow go to our livestock.

We wouldn't need to use those lands if we just ate less meat.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The bigger catch is that 70% of all crops we grow go to our livestock.

this isn't true

[–] pafu@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Livestock accounts for 77% of global farming land, while supplying only 18% of calories and 37% of protein.

Source

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

much of that is grazing land, not crops.

[–] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Added to what the other guy said (that it's grazing land that HAS to fallow whether used or not), that 77% number ALSO counts the waste from crops we're growing for humans, waste that would be going to an incinerator if they weren't going to a cow or pig.

Very few (if any, depending how you define the breakdown) crops are grown with animals as their focus. It just so happens that's how much of those crops we cannot digest.

[–] discodoubloon@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I don’t want it gone but I don’t want it subsidized. I’m not planning on being vegan but I’m cutting out a ton of animal protein from my life. I make it a special thing.

[–] rurutheguru@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

So you're saying almond milk drinkers could end up going to hell someday?

/s -The Good Place reference

[–] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like trying to compare a water intensive crop grown in a place known for drought to crops that can be grown in many places where water is far more readily available is being a bit disingenuous. You're not comparing apples to apples.

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, you could say that we shouldn't be wasting resources on animal agriculture anywhere, but especially in the same places that don't have enough water for crops.

Feeding food and giving water to other "food" will always be far less efficient than just providing a fraction of that water to plant-based foods. Animal agriculture is a waste.

[–] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Almond is the worst of the nut milks, but it's STILL way better for the environment than dairy.

[–] Frigid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What you get in stores is not even really almond milk. Real almond milk would be way too expensive to be competitive.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly... Ughh I still fail to understand why almond milk is popular among vegans. It's very expensive and doesn't even taste that nice...

[–] DarthFrodo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

True. Soy and oat milk can be very good, depending on the brand.

[–] RomeCallen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

oat milk is the jammy out of all the alt milks imo

[–] ComfortablyGlum@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] DarthFrodo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My favorite oat milk is Oatly Barista, the best soy milk I've tried is from Joya, but I haven't seen it outside of Austria yet. Alpro is quite good and more widely available (at least in Europe). In North America, Silk seems to be great from what I've heard. Store brand soy milks tend to taste pretty bad from my experience here in Germany, but some of them might have improved since I tried them years ago.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oatly and Califia both have great oat milks. They also have barista milks that substitute for half and half in coffee!

[–] ComfortablyGlum@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you for the suggestions!

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Welcome! Feel free to message with any questions or if you'd like more suggestions!

[–] Salix@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even soy milk in the US isn't really just soy milk. There are so much stuff added to it. It's thick too.

I grew up drinking a lot of real soy milk which has a watery consistency that I can get at some Vietnamese / Chinese grocery stores or tofu shops. Flavor is quite different too.

Though I guess the US put thickeners and other stuff into theirs to help imitate milk

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Still better than dairy.