this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
746 points (90.5% liked)

Games

16800 readers
838 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echo64@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Competition in the marketplace is the only thing that has any chance of saving you when that day comes.

You are in lucky days today. Tomorrow won't be so good, but you can choose to support an industry controlled by a monopoly, or you can support an industry with healthy competition.

I would hope that Gamers aren't so near sighted, but I've been proven wrong over and over again.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Supporting competition" is not a good enough reason to use a shitty service. If I start a service that charges twice as much as Steam and has none of the features would you use it in order to "support competition"?

If the only reason to purchase from Epic is "they exist" that's not good enough.

I will happily avoid Epic's attempts to be a monopoly now over worrying that Steam might be shitty in the future.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's super weird to me that you guys think epic is trying to be a monopoly. Epic had 0.00001% of the market. In their wildest dreams they might expect to get ten percent.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Epic had 0.00001% of the market.

The numbers for Fortnite, available on EGS but not Steam, tell otherwise.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

Just because they aren't good at it doesn't mean they aren't trying very hard to do so, and will clearly be very shitty if they ever achieve it.

[–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

When steam shuts down and we have Ubisoft and Epic to replace it with I'm just moving to itch.io and probably torrenting my steam library if it comes to the worst. Also I might actually stop playing games since steam is pushing proton development forward and without them I have no reason to play or buy anything new. Epic's shitty CEO has made toxic remarks against linux before and Ubisoft just couldn't care less. I'll support a company that supports my interests, epic doesn't so I don't simple as.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

That would be helpful if they actually tried to be competitive on the same level.

Unfortunately they're only competing for profit, not as a service. Which is why they're failing.

Competition bettering service only works if people want to compete to create a better service. That clearly isn't the case.