this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
1029 points (95.9% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2214 readers
326 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] arockinyourshoe@lemmy.world 134 points 1 year ago (6 children)

"If I had agreed to their request, then spacex would be explicitly complicit in a major act of war and conflict escalation"

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't SpaceX be explicitly complicit in conflict escalation by interfering with Ukraine's ability to defend itself?

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i guess we found out what musk thinks about the trolley problem

[–] atempuser23@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Now that it’s shown he is explicitly monitoring each attach by Ukraine, it shows he is responsible for every other attack that has used starlink.

It also shows that starlink is monitoring its traffic and use at an unexpected level.

This action shows Elon is 100% responsible for every other attack. This is why companies don’t usually do this.

[–] dsco@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Couldn't you say the same thing about power companies and the mail system? We're taking about shutting off utilities to help/hinder those that align with ideals.

[–] halvar@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Well at the very least you have to agree, that he was in quite a dilemma. If he allows it, he interferes by action. If he doesn't, he interferes by inaction.

To him, and to me too, inaction seems more impartial, which is probably all he cares about at this point, and once again it's what I would probably care about too.

You can be mad at someone who is impartial, but at the end of the day, the only thing you are mad at, is them not doing jack-shit, which of course can be very annoying.

[–] AJT@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not really since its already being used by the military, knowingly and deliberately provided.

So he's already active.

[–] halvar@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Well now you got me, since I didn't know that. So this guy then just lacks any integrity, which is not suprising at all.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He had a choice in his hands with privileged information, then he chose the Russian side. This declarations are just justification to wash his hands, he is team Putin all the way, always has been. He has been seen partying with Russian oligarchs. The reason he bought SpaceX was because his original idea of buying dismantled ICBMs from his rusky arms dealer pals was too incredibly stupid to pull off, and it was easier to do it by way of an aerospace company.

Starlink service was bought by Ukraine to provide internet access to civilians and the military. Technically it was provided by the US because Musk offered to, for free initially, though he later pedalled back to charge inordinate amounts of money. Which the US and UA agreed to pay anyway. Because single companies monopolizing entire control to fundamental services is a huge issue. War time or not. He is profiteering and unfortunately owns the only company that can provide this specific kind of service. But in strategic matters, he will always go to bat for his BFF Vova.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

"The best defense is a good offense"

Looks like you're right... I doubt the Russians agree with you though, lol.