this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
196 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29077 readers
147 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world/

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations ๐Ÿ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey all, so I've been trying to embrace the fediverse life. My background - I've been on the internet since pre-WWW, so I've seen it all.

I think there's a structural issue in the design of Lemmy, that's still correctable now but won't be if it gets much bigger. In short, I think we're federating the wrong data.

For those of you who used USENET back in the early days, when your ISP maintained a local copy of it, I think you'll pick up where I'm going with this fairly quickly. But I know there aren't a ton of us graybeards so I'll try to explain in detail.

As it's currently implemented, the Fediverse allows for multiple identically named communities to exist. I believe this is a mistake. The fediverse should have one uniquely named community instance, and part of the atomic data exchanged through the federation should include the instance that "owns" the community and a list of moderators. Each member server of the Fediverse should maintain an identical list of communities, based on server federation. Just like USENET of yore.

This could also be the gateway into instance transference. If the instances are more in-sync, it will be easier to transfer either a user account or a community.

This would eliminate the largest pain point/learning curve that Lemmy has vs Reddit.

Open to thought. And I'll admit this isn't fully fleshed out, it was just something I was thinking about as I was driving home from work tonight

Lemmy is good, but it could be great.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] llama@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Which I don't really think we want because it's all about context based on the instance. Technology@slrpnk.net would be all about solar tech whereas technology@beehaw.org would be more science and consumer electronics.

[โ€“] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think the mods of each sub should agree to aggregate using an "invite". It could also allow subs that have slightly different names on different instances to team up, if they are essentially the same thing.

[โ€“] DekkerNSFW@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I think that would self-correct when such a thing would be implemented. They'd just get more specific names, like solarpunktech or such. It would be an issue for existing communities like that though.

[โ€“] _sigma@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But with some fine grained tag support or similar, one could have a super powerful multi-reddit-esq thing that would make it easy to consume a specific type of content.

[โ€“] llama@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

This I would really like to see, and be able to group my subscriptions into feeds however I want instead of just the default subscribed feed. And it seems like it would be relatively simple to implement.