this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
992 points (84.4% liked)

Firefox

17937 readers
55 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] silvershrimp0@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At the time, same sex couples already had the right to marry in California. He donated money to take that right away from them. Would your stance be the same if he donated money to remove civil rights protections for racial minorities?

[–] A2PKXG@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That actually makes a difference to me.

I think civil rights for minorities are super important.

I find marriage much less important. It's essentially just a symbol. (Or is it about the tax benefits and legal protections in case of death? That's substantial)

[–] silvershrimp0@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, just a symbol until your deceased partner's family tries to take your house. Just a symbol until you realize you can't sponsor your foreign partner for immigration because the government doesn't recognize your relationship.

Those legal protections around property are the whole point of the law recognizing marriage.