this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
1042 points (96.7% liked)

Selfhosted

40316 readers
395 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I thought data caps for home internet were a thing of the past…

I’ve somewhat recently moved back to a very rural area of the Midwest. Small town. No stop lights. Biggest businesses other than the bars are Casey’s, Subway, and Dollar General.

And we have one ISP (not counting DSL) — Mediacom. When we first signed up, I had to go with the second service tier. But not because of speeds, but so I could have a reasonable 1 TB/mo data cap.

Lucky me, they increased the cap to 1.5 TB. 🙄

I hope that in my lifetime I can see ISPs regulated as a public utility.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orangeboats@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I sorta understand why data caps were implemented in the past. Some people hosted servers on their home connection, and their total internet traffic in a week would far exceed that of a normal user's. Data caps were meant to force people to be conservative on their internet usage so this would not happen.

But come on now, it's 2023. If your internet infrastructure could not handle that amount of traffic, you are a laughing stock of ISPs.

[–] Overcast@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Data cap never made sense because ISPs pay for pipe size, not total of data. Someone using 20mbps 24/7 will use a lot more data but cause a lot less congestion than someone using 300mbps for 1hr at peak hour every day.

If their infra is undersized, they should at least not count data between midnight and 8am toward the data cap since the pipes are mostly sitting idles

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The Internet is not a big truck 🚛 it's a series of tubes ➿

[–] orangeboats@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Overall everyone will use less data when there's a data cap, I found.

My ISP implemented data caps back then too (thankfully it's all removed now, but 60GB was really bonkers!) and I just find it fascinating how much traffic I generate nowadays, when I don't have to care how much data I have left this month.

Anyways, data caps shouldn't be relevant anymore in 2023 when absolutely everything can handle gigabits and more. It's interesting how American ISPs still implement them.