this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
466 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3311 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The pledge includes a clause saying that the candidate will support the eventual GOP nominee.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 105 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is great news IMO

He'll run on his own Freedom Party ticket and we'll get a 3-party election. Oh no, now the rightwing votes are split. Bummer!

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 51 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Much more likely at this point that he just wins the nomination. There is still time for that to change, but nothing that indicates that it will.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The GOP is in a terrible state

[–] NewEnglandRedshirt@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We all know they're in Mississippi, but there are chapters in some good states, too.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, the ol'... Wait a minute, what site am I on?

[–] jayknight@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Matt_Shatt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

We’ve all been lemmboozled!

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago

The US is in a terrible state. Mostly because of the GOP.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Right, there's really no reason for Trump to participate in the debates anyway - he's way far out in front, so it would only hurt him. Hell, this might even be an excuse to skip them without looking like he's afraid to.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago

Trump doesn't believe he will win the nomination. If he believed he would win, there would be no problem with him signing the pledge. He believes the eventual nominee will be one of 3 or 4 people he despises and cannot support.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He’ll run on his own Freedom Party ticket and we’ll get a 3-party election. Oh no, now the rightwing votes are split. Bummer!

Republicans are too spineless. Realistically trump will threaten to run third party, and they will forgo the primaries and hand him the nomination.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Isn't that a little unconstitutional? I know that hasn't stopped them in the past, but just straight up cancelling a vote of the people is more blatantly fascist than I'd expect from even them.

[–] onionbaggage@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The political parties are private organizations. They can do whatever they want with their nomination process.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah in short even the democratic party notes that. When the DNC was sued under the accusation of rigging the primaries against Bernie Sanders. The case was thrown out for lack of standing. In short the DNC said "You are accusing us of rigging the primaries... but rigging the primaries isn't a crime so there's no reason to spend the time proving it one way or the other".

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Primaries aren't in the constitution

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It says that if there is a primary election, citizens cannot be refused the right to vote due to not paying taxes or a "poll tax"

It says nothing about when or if such an election should be held.