this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
349 points (90.5% liked)

Privacy

32109 readers
788 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Definitely not. The whole "allow some ads to earn rewards" thing doesn't sit right with me. The only adblockers that do that are in bed with the ad companies. Firefox with UBlock Origin and NoScript + Strict security settings is all you need.

[–] Lemongrab@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

NoScript is obsolete with uBlock

[–] notenoughbutter@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

what about cross site scripting?

[–] msage@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is NoScript obsoleted by uBlock?

[–] Lemongrab@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The features of NoScript are also present in uBlock. Reducing extensions reduces attack surface and possible fingerprinting, though if your threat model requires resistant fingerprinting against advanced scripts use tor.

[–] krnl386@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can turns that off… also those ads are text notifications that are shown at predetermined (by the user) time intervals.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good job on missing my point entirely. Turning off a setting that shouldn't exist in the first place doesn't solve anything.

[–] krnl386@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I like choice. I use Librewolf with Adnauseam for sites that are in the super sketchy category, and Brave for everything else.

Using Noscript is safe, sure, but I’m not into 1992 web browsing, except at nerdout parties where we try using an old 486 laptop running Windows 95 and Netscape 4.01 to browse today’s web.

My point is that there are reasonable steps and compromises one can take to protect their privacy somewhat. Achieving Snowden level protection is cool, but not my cup of tea; too much of a compromise and loss of functionality, sorry. Sure, you can drop a nuke (like NoScript) in retaliation, but that’s overkill and will break most modern sites out there.

Brave, on the other hand, is based on uBlock Origin with actively maintained filters. It’s also 100% compatible with custom filters too. It’s also nicely deGoogled out of the box, so that’s definitely a bonus.