this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
416 points (97.3% liked)

Science

3398 readers
1041 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If we were a smarter society, we’d end our stupid cold war with them and cooperate.

[–] blackluster117@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If they were a more humane society, we likely would.

[–] Schmoo 4 points 15 hours ago

Is the argument here that China isn't worthy of the United States' cooperation? We here in the US need to get over ourselves and stop acting as if we have the moral high ground over everyone else. There are a lot of things about the US that are far from humane, and we do cooperate with countries that engage in far worse, often on our behalf. Our adversarial disposition towards China has nothing to do with human rights and everything to do with geopolitics.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (3 children)

More humane like Nazi-America, or more humane like Warcrimes-Russia? Description unclear, please clarify.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

To clarify, what you're doing is "what-aboutism". Asking China to be more humane is not a comment on anything but China being more humane.

[–] Schmoo 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They weren't just asking China to be more humane, though. They were suggesting that China doesn't deserve our cooperation because they are inhumane, which implies we have the moral high ground and is explicitly hypocritical. It isn't whataboutism to point out hypocrisy.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

There's a lot of assuming, implying, and suggesting in that take. The original just said if they were more humane we would work with them.

[–] Schmoo 2 points 13 hours ago

You don't at all see how that implies moral superiority? Or are you just giving them the benefit of the doubt?

The problem is holding China to a higher standard than we hold ourselves to.

Honestly China might start looking moderate compared to what I expect our new Dear Leader to do in the coming years.

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 18 hours ago

China could stand to be more humane, but it wouldn't make the US cooperate with them.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Try to read up and understand what whataboutism means. Because you clearly didn't get the point of my comment.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

You brought up other societies as compared them to us. It's the definition of what-aboutism, just read up on it again to make sure.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 34 points 1 day ago

More humane like the best of us wish to be and the majority of us never will be

[–] guy@piefed.social 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

More humane as in respecting human rights I suppose

[–] kugel7c@feddit.org -4 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Is there a state that is not disrespecting human rights ? I for one haven't heard of any.

[–] guy@piefed.social 5 points 23 hours ago

Degrees in hell maybe.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world -2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

More like if they were willing to embrace capitalistic western values and bend over for America whenever we're feeling frisky

[–] eric5949@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Thinking that china isn't capitalist just because the ruling party has communist in the name is funny

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago

Never said they weren't. Just that it doesn't align with capitalistic western values.

[–] xnx 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah more humane like Israel… America has been installing dictators all around the world for decades what are you talking about? You think America cares about humanity? You cant even birth a child without a $10,000+ bill.

America cares about moneyyyyy and nothing more

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 23 hours ago

We topple democratically-elected leaders because it suits our economic plans. People downvoting the above comment don't know shit about history. And that's because our schools don't accurately teach it.