this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
314 points (99.4% liked)

News

23367 readers
4275 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Passengers on an American Airlines flight from Milwaukee to Dallas-Fort Worth restrained a Canadian man with duct tape after he allegedly attempted to open a cabin door mid-flight, claiming he was the “captain” and needed to exit.

The man became aggressive, injuring a flight attendant as he rushed toward the door.

Several passengers, including Doug McCright and Charlie Boris, subdued him, using duct tape to secure his hands and ankles.

Authorities detained the man upon landing, and the incident remains under investigation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They probably were going through some kind of mania or hallucination episode.

Don’t always assume the worst in people, “eye for an eye” has never worked.

[–] we_avoid_temptation@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

"Eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" is the more accurate version I think

[–] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

This saying is a pet peeve of mine, because it's so contrary to the actual meaning of "eye for an eye", which is a prohibition against escalation. Like in this case the guy injured someone's neck and wrist, so the maximum punishment would be injuring his neck and wrist, not killing him. That's not to say "eye for an eye" is an ideal justice system, just that it is opposed to wanton revenge and violence.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I like that saying, I’ll be reusing it.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's the original saying 😭

[–] Ridgetop18@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Uh, no? "An eye for an eye." is old school ancient.

It was however a limiting statement. When Hammurabi made "an eye for an eye" into law, it meant you couldn't just go kill a man's entire family over losing an eye and call it justified.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Fair enough. I've honestly only ever heard the other.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Where the counter comes from doesn't preclude this, but is an evolution of it. If the law says your family takes their eye in revenge for them taking yours, then they take revenge for what you did, etc. It creates a potential for a cycle of vengeance. It's better than nothing probably, but it also has serious flaws.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

not at all https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_for_an_eye

“eye for an eye” is about 4’000 years old

the above saying is an american idiom coined in 1914