this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
248 points (98.8% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5286 readers
863 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7
248
1.5C is dead. The climate fight isn’t. | Trump’s re-election is “the final nail in the coffin” for the Paris Agreement's North Star goal, nine experts told HEATED. But we can still limit the damage. (heated.world)
submitted 2 weeks ago by silence7 to c/climate
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"ok.. we broke yet another goal we set for ourselves. But we can still limit damage!!"

How many times does this have to repeat before we can't limit the damage anymore

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, we can always limit the damage because the damage only goes up if we don't.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Aure, but I get tired of the rhetoric, like there's never any actual consequences for breaking the limits. The people responsible just keep on chugging along

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Totally with you.

[–] yessikg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

When the damage is bad enough to kill us all