this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
330 points (92.5% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

6900 readers
1 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fair enough, but in a way chickens kinda should be on there anyways. They can't exactly fly very far, spend like 98% of their life on the ground, and humans breed them for food.

[–] BlackRose 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think the argument was chickens not being mammals.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, indeed. Still seems they should have been a bit more broad than restricting the data to land mammals, more like humans vs food.

Oh well, it is what it is.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They don't spend 98% of their life on the ground in the wild. They sleep in trees, just like turkeys and peacocks.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

90%+ chickens are bred for food, I don't think there's all that many truly wild chickens out there anymore.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

There are probably some somewhere, but yeah not many. However the ones that are bred for food typically weigh more.

Hell, if you let a meat chicken grow beyond its sell-by date, there's a good chance it will develop so much muscle mass it cannot stand up anymore, and it will rot to death on the spot.

[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm pretty sure they were domesticated from something (a South Asian jungle fowl, I believe) to the extent that they are no longer even the same species. So any "wild" chickens would just be feral escapees.