this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
94 points (96.1% liked)
Open Source
31362 readers
274 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Quoting JetBrains,
(emphasis mine)
So it is only temporarily free. Once it's polished it will no longer be free. Better to not get tied in to something that will be taken away from you before long.
Huh, TIL. I never even considered it being paid, because you can't really compete with VS Code with a paid product. If you don't mind paid products, chances are you're already using some of JetBrains IDEs because they are simply miles ahead. Fleet being paid just doesn't make sense. Well, we'll see what they come up with.
You can also just… pay for it? I give money to JetBrains in exchange for incredibly useful tools. It’s okay to pay for things.
Considering the context of the thread, this isn't really a useful take. They were talking about free software (open source at that). They were warning them it won't be free forever and, seeing as how that is a requirement, then yeah, it would be taken away.
There's no need to be condescending when you're in the wrong conversation with your opinion. No one said you can't pay for things or that it's not ok.
So your high horse isn't needed here.
What a weird take. You're allowed to pay for whatever you'd like. Personally, I can't afford to pay for any JetBrains product, even if I wanted to.
Not only are there alternatives which may be better overall or better suited to someone's needs, that wasn't even my point. My point was more that it is only temporarily free, and so the parent commenter's comment of "it's free" should be taken with a grain of salt if you're considering the product.
Moreover, we're in the Open Source community: Fleet is neither free nor open source, and pointing that out here is relevant.