Just Post

639 readers

251 users here now

Just post something 💛

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

suns3t@lemmy.world

dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world

641

This is a bigger culture shock than the metric vs imperial system to me. (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/justpost@lemmy.world

315 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

Distribution of the two (pink is mixed) from Wikipedia:

distribution of the two

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What's crazy is that it's not consistent by language. Obviously we have British/Aussie/Kiwi vs US/Canadian English, but the Spanish speaking world is also fractured.

[–] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

And not even by otherwise closely related geographical regions. The Nordics, one of the world's most internally cooperative group of countries, have Sweden and Denmark using the ~~English~~ British system, and Finland and Norway using the ~~British~~ American system.

Edit: I'm a dumbass

[–] disgrunty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Did you mean to say American for one of those systems? England is part of Great Britain.

[–] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

I did indeed, thanks for pointing it out.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Antarctica is mixed... that means there are at least two multifloor buildings there... and they couldn't agree on it

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Well that one you would kinda expect, as each Antarctic base is built by a different country - and complicated by some of the buildings being on stilts.

[–] ShakeThatYam@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

US, Russia, and China on the same side is weird to see.

[–] OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

I am from Baltics and always assumed naming 1st floor ground floor was weird. Turns out we are the weird ones.

[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

Make up your mind, Antarctica.

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Canada should be mixed or blue.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What? Why? On the east coast I've mostly seen ground as first floor. Sometimes below ground is counted though.

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I've worked on a few buildings in Quebec that all use the European style. hate it!

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've lived in Québec all my life, been in Montréal for 17 years, and I've never seen a building that uses the European style of floor numbering. It throws me off when I go in Europe. You may have experienced the exception rather than the rule.

We usually have RC (rez-de-chaussée/road level), 2, 3, 4...

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

could be. they have all been the same type of building so maybe a querk. it started off being designed “normal” and then they changed it.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do they have 13th floors?

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

nah. the latest is 4 stories with floors 0, 1, 2, 3, R, and then dunnage level if you count that

[–] wick@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Australia should be mixed. I've seen elevators labelled both ways, and personally I've referred to the ground floor as the 1st my entire life here.