this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
264 points (100.0% liked)

196

16552 readers
2769 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] actual_trash@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is a real gamer, going for that mad refresh rate on the right and the fabulous view on the left

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Either mad refresh rate or maybe more accurate sprite blurring for emulated old console games.

[–] IDatedSuccubi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Singleplayer on the left, multiplayer on the right

[–] eu@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Not having a CRT monitor is my new excuse for sucking at CS:GO.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You got LCDs these days that go up to 500hz, CRTs aren't the best at it anymore really. Maybe they still have slightly better response times, but even that is a losing battle for them.

iirc it's still 0.001 ms on CRTs vs 0.1ms on the best LCDs?

But that's not their main advantage, their main advantage is having absolutely zero motion blur thanks to natural, inbuilt BFI (having one frame that just gives way to another causes some amount of them blurring together in your visual cortex, while if there's a black frame in between that keeps them perfectly separate, and even when running, 90% of a CRT's screen will be black at any given time). Also that natural BFI makes them look a lot smoother than an LCD, like a CRT at 60hz will look as good as an LCD at 120hz.