this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
524 points (99.2% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

1417 readers
474 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Shrug, they been talking about this since the 90's...

If it was feasible and economically viable. It would have happened already.

[โ€“] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 months ago

The reason is because the company that operates a shipping vessel often doesn't own the ship--they charter it. It would be the owner that pays for the fancy wind propulsion systems but only the charterer would benefit from the reduced fuel costs. Owner-operators of shipping vessels sometimes do have a supplemental wind propulsion system.